Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.compilers > #2049

Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support

Show all headers | View raw

Martin,

> On 08/04/18 14:21, Derek M. Jones wrote:
>>> Modern popular languages are neither powerful nor easy to learn.
>>
>> What evidence do you have for this?
>
> The C standard is over 700 pages: not exactly an easy read.

By evidence I mean an evaluation of multiple languages.

Here are some languages from 1957.  Were they powerful and easy
to learn?

http://shape-of-code.coding-guidelines.com/2017/05/21/evidence-for-28-possible-compilers-in-1957/

....> memorise and avoid using if they want to write conformant and
> compatible code.

I thought we were talking about powerful and easy to learn?

> On the other hand, the Revised^4 Report on the Algorithmic Language
> Scheme ("Dedicated to the Memory of ALGOL 60") is only a 55 page manual
> but it includes the full syntax and semantics of the language.

My question was about powerful and easy to learn.  Not about number
of pages in the language specification.
[In my experience, any language that is semantically similar to
languages you already know is easy to learn.  For example, I find
python comprehensions obvious and easy to use because they're just a
syntax for a function mapping.  I know other python programmers who
find them baffling and always write "for" loops instead, presumably
because the languages they'd used didn't do much function mapping.
-John]

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2018-04-10 16:11 +0100
  Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support "Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> - 2018-04-10 16:56 +0100
  Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2018-04-10 16:04 +0000
    Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support "Derek M. Jones" <derek@_NOSPAM_knosof.co.uk> - 2018-04-10 23:14 +0100
      Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2018-04-13 13:55 +0100
  Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2018-04-10 11:04 -0700
  Re: language design after Algol 60, was Add nested-function support Kaz Kylheku <157-073-9834@kylheku.com> - 2018-04-10 18:38 +0000

csiph-web