Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!nerds-end From: HOKIENERD Newsgroups: comp.compilers Subject: Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Organization: Compilers Central Lines: 16 Sender: news@iecc.com Approved: comp.compilers@iecc.com Message-ID: <12-03-057@comp.compilers> References: <12-03-007@comp.compilers> <12-03-010@comp.compilers> <12-03-028@comp.compilers> <12-03-031@comp.compilers> NNTP-Posting-Host: news.iecc.com X-Trace: leila.iecc.com 1332773943 85215 64.57.183.58 (26 Mar 2012 14:59:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@iecc.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Keywords: code, debug Posted-Date: 26 Mar 2012 10:59:03 EDT X-submission-address: compilers@iecc.com X-moderator-address: compilers-request@iecc.com X-FAQ-and-archives: http://compilers.iecc.com Xref: csiph.com comp.compilers:524 I finally got to the assembly code, and it is indeed rcheck_12 (and a few similar checks). We were hoping to add comments throughout the code, and 'prove' that they had no effect by producing an identical executable, but it looks like we won't be able to do that. The line number is useful in our debug environment, but in our final system there is nowhere for the information to be output, so it won't do us any good in that configuration. I sure can't find a way to turn it off on my system! Thanks for all the help! John