Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #503
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable |
| Date | Wed, 14 Mar 2012 05:26:05 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Lines | 23 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <12-03-036@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <12-03-007@comp.compilers> <12-03-010@comp.compilers> <12-03-028@comp.compilers> <12-03-031@comp.compilers> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | news.iecc.com |
| X-Trace | leila.iecc.com 1331777481 99276 64.57.183.58 (15 Mar 2012 02:11:21 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@iecc.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 15 Mar 2012 02:11:21 +0000 (UTC) |
| Keywords | code, debug |
| Posted-Date | 14 Mar 2012 22:11:21 EDT |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compilers:503 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.theworld.com> wrote: > HOKIENERD <hokienerd@gmail.com> writes: >> It absolutely is the line number. (Thanks for the tip.) > You're welcome. >>... I hope to get to the assembly code before too long. >> I sure wish I could keep the check, but lose the line number! > Why? All the OS/360 compilers I remember had an option to turn on or off keeping the statement numbers. When memory was small, it might have made a difference. In the case of PL/I on the 360/91, though, when statement numbering was on the compiler generated BR 0 instructions between each statement, which flushes the 360/91 (and any other out-of-order processor) pipeline such that the number would be right. That was the default on the systems I used, too. -- glen
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable "Morris, John M CIV NSWCDD, Q34" <john.m.morris@navy.mil> - 2012-03-06 08:32 -0500
Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-06 19:51 +0000
Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> - 2012-03-06 16:25 -0500
Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable HOKIENERD <hokienerd@gmail.com> - 2012-03-12 07:36 -0700
Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> - 2012-03-13 09:34 -0400
Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-14 05:26 +0000
Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable HOKIENERD <hokienerd@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 07:33 -0700
Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> - 2012-03-26 13:36 -0400
csiph-web