Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.compilers > #503

Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups comp.compilers
Subject Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable
Date Wed, 14 Mar 2012 05:26:05 +0000 (UTC)
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines 23
Sender news@iecc.com
Approved comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID <12-03-036@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References <12-03-007@comp.compilers> <12-03-010@comp.compilers> <12-03-028@comp.compilers> <12-03-031@comp.compilers>
NNTP-Posting-Host news.iecc.com
X-Trace leila.iecc.com 1331777481 99276 64.57.183.58 (15 Mar 2012 02:11:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@iecc.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Thu, 15 Mar 2012 02:11:21 +0000 (UTC)
Keywords code, debug
Posted-Date 14 Mar 2012 22:11:21 EDT
X-submission-address compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives http://compilers.iecc.com
Xref csiph.com comp.compilers:503

Show key headers only | View raw


Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.theworld.com> wrote:
> HOKIENERD <hokienerd@gmail.com> writes:

>> It absolutely is the line number. (Thanks for the tip.)

> You're welcome.

>>... I hope to get to the assembly code before too long.
>> I sure wish I could keep the check, but lose the line number!

> Why?

All the OS/360 compilers I remember had an option to turn on or
off keeping the statement numbers. When memory was small, it might
have made a difference.

In the case of PL/I on the 360/91, though, when statement numbering
was on the compiler generated BR 0 instructions between each statement,
which flushes the 360/91 (and any other out-of-order processor) pipeline
such that the number would be right. That was the default on the
systems I used, too.

-- glen

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable "Morris, John M CIV NSWCDD, Q34" <john.m.morris@navy.mil> - 2012-03-06 08:32 -0500
  Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-06 19:51 +0000
  Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> - 2012-03-06 16:25 -0500
    Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable HOKIENERD <hokienerd@gmail.com> - 2012-03-12 07:36 -0700
      Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> - 2012-03-13 09:34 -0400
        Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-14 05:26 +0000
        Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable HOKIENERD <hokienerd@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 07:33 -0700
          Re: Adding Blank Line In Source Causes Change In Executable Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> - 2012-03-26 13:36 -0400

csiph-web