Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From: drb@ihatespam.msu.edu (Dennis Boone)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Subject: Re: Parser generator for PL/I
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:40:38 -0600
Organization: Compilers Central
Lines: 9
Sender: news@iecc.com
Approved: comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID: <12-01-025@comp.compilers>
References: <12-01-009@comp.compilers> <12-01-010@comp.compilers> <12-01-021@comp.compilers>
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.iecc.com
X-Trace: leila.iecc.com 1326606978 26655 64.57.183.58 (15 Jan 2012 05:56:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@iecc.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 05:56:18 +0000 (UTC)
Keywords: PL/I, parse
Posted-Date: 15 Jan 2012 00:56:18 EST
X-submission-address: compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address: compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives: http://compilers.iecc.com
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.compilers:424

 > Have you looked at XPL?

 > The output is almost PL/I.

I've actually been trying to figure out what the differences are
between XPL and Extended XPL.

De