Re: Looking for volunteers for XL

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.42!gegeweb.eu!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!198.186.194.250.MISMATCH!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From	"BartC" <bc@freeuk.com>
Newsgroups	comp.compilers
Subject	Re: Looking for volunteers for XL
Date	Sat, 26 Nov 2011 23:19:29 -0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	31
Sender	news@iecc.com
Approved	comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID	<11-11-054@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References	<11-11-048@comp.compilers> <11-11-053@comp.compilers>
NNTP-Posting-Host	news.iecc.com
X-Trace	leila.iecc.com 1322378707 6611 64.57.183.58 (27 Nov 2011 07:25:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@iecc.com
NNTP-Posting-Date	Sun, 27 Nov 2011 07:25:07 +0000 (UTC)
Keywords	history, design
Posted-Date	27 Nov 2011 02:25:07 EST
X-submission-address	compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address	compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives	http://compilers.iecc.com
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.compilers:356

Show key headers only | View raw

"Christophe de Dinechin" <christophe@taodyne.com> wrote in message
>> [There were a bazillion extensible languages in the 1970s, many quite
>> sophisticated.  They all disappeared without a trace, largely because
>> the ability to do per-program extensions meant that every program was
>> written in a different language, making them all unreadable. ...

> [I wrote actual programs in IMP-72.  The compiler was slow, but not
> unduly so for the time, and it was in the same ballpark as BLISS-11
> which got a lot of use.  (They both cross-compiled on a PDP-10.) We
> gave up on it because we didn't want to try to remember which of six
> slightly different case statements each program used. -John]

Extensible languages have to be used with some care I think. Those
features aren't for everyday use.

They should be used to turn a language X into a new language X2. X2
should be properly designed, implemented, and documented. Then
development should be halted.

(And there should either have been one kind of case statement, or all
six case statements should have been distinct.)

For this kind of purpose, an extensible language might work well.

However, if the design of X2 isn't going to change, you might as well
just write a compiler directly for X2; it's not necessary to make
available, to the programmer of X2, all those untidy language-building
features (for an example, see C++).

--
Bartc

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Looking for volunteers for XL Christophe de Dinechin <christophe@taodyne.com> - 2011-11-22 21:03 -0800
  Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-11-26 05:43 +0000
  Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Christophe de Dinechin <christophe@taodyne.com> - 2011-11-26 12:38 -0800
    Re: Looking for volunteers for XL "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-26 23:19 +0000
      Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Christophe de Dinechin <christophe@taodyne.com> - 2011-11-27 12:34 -0800
        Re: Looking for volunteers for XL "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-27 22:24 +0000
          Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Christophe de Dinechin <christophe@taodyne.com> - 2011-11-28 14:12 -0800
            Re: Looking for volunteers for XL ardjussi <jussi.santti@ard.fi> - 2011-11-30 13:16 -0800
              Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-12-01 05:44 +0000
                Re: overloading, was Looking for volunteers for XL glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-12-02 05:36 +0000
          Re: Looking for volunteers for XL tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2012-01-03 09:28 -0800
      Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-11-28 04:45 +0000
        Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Timothy Knox <tdk@thelbane.com> - 2011-11-27 22:50 -0800
          Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2011-12-01 12:11 -0800
        Re: Looking for volunteers for XL "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-11-28 10:23 +0000
          Re: Looking for volunteers for XL glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-11-29 07:37 +0000
            Re: macros, Looking for volunteers for XL Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-03 17:36 -0800
              Re: macros, Looking for volunteers for XL glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-12-05 04:24 +0000
          Re: Looking for volunteers for XL Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-12-01 05:35 +0000
            Re: designing language extensions, was Looking for volunteers for XL Marco van de Voort <marcov@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-12-03 13:02 +0000
            Re: Looking for volunteers for XL jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2011-12-13 00:08 +0000
              Re: macros, was Looking for volunteers for XL Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-12-13 01:39 +0000
                Re: macros, was Looking for volunteers for XL Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-12-14 19:00 +0000
                Re: macros, was Looking for volunteers for XL jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2011-12-15 15:40 +0000
                Re: macros, was Looking for volunteers for XL Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-12-16 17:48 +0000
        Re: Looking for volunteers for XL glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-11-28 10:26 +0000

csiph-web