Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From: "Armel" <armelasselin@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Subject: Re: coupling LALR with a scanner?
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 11:17:59 +0200
Organization: les newsgroups par Orange
Lines: 15
Sender: news@iecc.com
Approved: comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID: <11-08-004@comp.compilers>
References: <11-07-013@comp.compilers> <11-07-015@comp.compilers> <11-07-018@comp.compilers>
NNTP-Posting-Host: news.iecc.com
X-Trace: gal.iecc.com 1312472294 44849 64.57.183.58 (4 Aug 2011 15:38:14 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@iecc.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 15:38:14 +0000 (UTC)
Keywords: LALR
Posted-Date: 04 Aug 2011 11:38:14 EDT
X-submission-address: compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address: compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives: http://compilers.iecc.com
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.compilers:221

"Karsten Nyblad"  a icrit dans le message de groupe de discussion :
> You have not written if your generator supports LALR(k) or just LALR(1).
just LALR(1) or GLALR(1)

>In the later case my suggestion is that you change your generator to an
>LR(1) generator.
I will soon do LR(1) or something in-between (e.g. IELR(1))

From what I could read in the work a Joel Denny about PSLR (pseudo
scannerless LR) the approach is valid. It does not seem really hard to make
something similar.

Regards
Armel