Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.alt.net!news.kjsl.com!rahul.net!wasp.rahul.net!rahul.net!news.lightlink.com!news.iecc.com!nerds-end From: Roberto Waltman Newsgroups: comp.compilers Subject: Re: Language Design Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:22:54 -0400 Organization: Compilers Central Lines: 10 Sender: news@iecc.com Approved: comp.compilers@iecc.com Message-ID: <11-07-040@comp.compilers> References: <11-07-027@comp.compilers> <11-07-038@comp.compilers> NNTP-Posting-Host: news.iecc.com X-Trace: gal.iecc.com 1312130219 52090 64.57.183.58 (31 Jul 2011 16:36:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@iecc.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 16:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Keywords: history Posted-Date: 31 Jul 2011 12:36:59 EDT X-submission-address: compilers@iecc.com X-moderator-address: compilers-request@iecc.com X-FAQ-and-archives: http://compilers.iecc.com Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.compilers:216 Gene wrote: >The old Turbo Pascal 2.0 dialect was pretty remarkable. There was a >version for Z80 (CP/M) and 8086 (MSDOS). I think the whole compiler >was only 50K or so. The CPM 3.0 version was 31K - As you said, remarkable. (Available here: http://www.retroarchive.org/cpm/lang/lang.htm ) -- Roberto Waltman