Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.compilers > #206
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.snarked.org!newsfeed.news.ucla.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!usenet.osg.ufl.edu!news.lightlink.com!news.iecc.com!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | Srinivas Nayak <sinu.nayak2001@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Language Design |
| Date | Mon, 18 Jul 2011 22:54:33 -0700 (PDT) |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Lines | 19 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <11-07-030@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <11-07-027@comp.compilers> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | news.iecc.com |
| X-Trace | gal.iecc.com 1311403071 67176 64.57.183.58 (23 Jul 2011 06:37:51 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@iecc.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sat, 23 Jul 2011 06:37:51 +0000 (UTC) |
| Keywords | design, theory |
| Posted-Date | 23 Jul 2011 02:37:50 EDT |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.compilers:206 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hi Bill, Why do you think a stack based language shall not be turing complete? You can get some ideas from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esoteric_programming_language http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FALSE "A Turing tarpit is a Turing-complete programming language whose number of commands, operators, or equivalent objects is very small. These include brainfuck (8 commands, all with 0 operands), OISC (1 command, 3 operands), and Thue (1 command, 2 operands)." - Wiki Many stack based languages are turing complete. Sincerely, Srinivas Nayak
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Language Design Billy Mays <81282ed9a88799d21e77957df2d84bd6514d9af6@myhashismyemail.com> - 2011-07-18 16:16 -0400
Re: Language Design Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2011-07-18 18:10 -0400
Re: Language Design Srinivas Nayak <sinu.nayak2001@gmail.com> - 2011-07-18 22:54 -0700
Re: Language Design anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-07-19 13:12 +0000
Re: Language Design Andreas Zwinkau <zwinkau@kit.edu> - 2011-07-20 13:26 +0200
Re: Language Design mac <acolvin@efunct.com> - 2011-07-23 01:11 +0000
Re: Language Design Christophe de Dinechin <christophe.de.dinechin@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 08:17 -0700
Re: Language Design Oleg Sesov <osesov@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 14:58 -0700
Re: Language Design Gene <gene.ressler@gmail.com> - 2011-07-26 10:28 -0700
Re: Language Design Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2011-07-28 13:22 -0400
Re: Language Design torbenm@diku.dk (Torben Ægidius Mogensen) - 2011-08-08 16:11 +0200
Re: Language Design tm <thomas.mertes@gmx.at> - 2011-07-27 08:11 -0700
Re: Language Design "s_dubrovich@yahoo.com" <s_dubrovich@yahoo.com> - 2011-08-04 18:43 -0700
Re: Language Design for a tiny processor "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-08-08 22:54 +0100
csiph-web