Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.compilers > #150

Re: Inverse grep

From anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Newsgroups comp.compilers
Subject Re: Inverse grep
Date 2011-06-15 12:28 +0000
Organization Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID <11-06-024@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References <11-06-015@comp.compilers> <11-06-022@comp.compilers>

Show all headers | View raw


torbenm@diku.dk (Torben Fgidius Mogensen) writes:
>glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> writes:
>
>> I suppose this is a strange question, but I was wondering if
>> there was ever something like an inverse grep.  That is,
>> match a string against a file full of regular expressions. ...

>[How serious is the explosion problem in practice, now that compilers
>no longer have to fit into 64k? We use lex scanners with a thousand
>tokens, and spamassassin feeds about 2000 patterns to re2c if you use
>the compiled patterns feature. None of them seem to strain our storage
>systems. -John]

Even if it was a problem, the solution has been around a long time
(although I am not aware of an academic paper about it): Generate the
DFA on-demand, only for those transitions that are actually used.
Then the worst-case memory demands are O(n) where n is the length of
the input string (and in the usual case the memory usage grows much
slower).

In tree-parsing automata (i.e., not for regexps) I have had cases
where the size of the statically generated automaton was a problem
<https://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/lazyburg/gforth9.burg>: We
could not generate the automata for the largest tree grammars in
practical time and even had problems compiling some of the code that
we could generate.  OTOH, on-demand generation of automaton states
worked even for the largest tree grammars, and memory consumption was
on the order of 2MB IIRC.  The numbers will be different for regexps,
but I expect the effect to be the same: on-demand automata will work
in many cases where static automata take too long to generate or are
too big to run.  The paper about this work is
<http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/papers/ertl+06pldi.ps.gz>

- anton
--
M. Anton Ertl
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Inverse grep glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-06-08 23:01 +0000
  Re: Inverse grep Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com> - 2011-06-12 14:16 -0400
    Re: Inverse grep Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> - 2011-06-13 17:48 +0100
  Re: Inverse grep torbenm@diku.dk (Torben Ægidius Mogensen) - 2011-06-14 11:16 +0200
    Re: Inverse grep anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2011-06-15 12:28 +0000
    Matching very large patterns, was Re: Inverse grep Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com> - 2011-06-19 21:45 -0400
      Re: Matching very large patterns, was Re: Inverse grep glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2011-06-20 04:52 +0000

csiph-web