Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!news.ripco.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news.glorb.com!news.mv.net!news.lightlink.com!news.iecc.com!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | Alex <alexander.mikhailov@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | GLR state of the art? |
| Date | Tue, 5 Apr 2011 10:41:09 -0700 (PDT) |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Lines | 7 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <11-04-005@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | news.iecc.com |
| X-Trace | gal.iecc.com 1302060610 1328 64.57.183.58 (6 Apr 2011 03:30:10 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@iecc.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 6 Apr 2011 03:30:10 +0000 (UTC) |
| Keywords | parse, question, GLR |
| Posted-Date | 05 Apr 2011 23:30:10 EDT |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.compilers:72 |
Show key headers only | View raw
I'm looking into technologies allowing to parse languages from arbitrary CF grammars. I know there are several approaches, Tomita parsing being one example. I don't however know what is the current opinion on various such technologies is. Is there, for example, something which is considered superior to Tomita parsing by all interesting measures?
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
GLR state of the art? Alex <alexander.mikhailov@gmail.com> - 2011-04-05 10:41 -0700 Re: GLR state of the art? "Ira Baxter" <idbaxter@semdesigns.com> - 2011-04-06 10:33 -0500
csiph-web