Re: ada to java

From	Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir <Spamassassin@irrt.De>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.ada, comp.compilers.tools.javacc
Subject	Re: ada to java
Date	2025-08-13 17:17 +0200
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<db4b5b0b-712d-23f1-42fd-575b34234f18@irrt.De> (permalink)
References	<bpat2g$c3a$1@email.tds-eagan.lmco.com> <75bc24aa-4004-c622-ce30-93f989ae30f3@insomnia247.nl> <ff6p9khb78l8vn6rgqtbhjpt7q8vk3h62s@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 13 Aug 2025, Von Ottone wrote:
"Right. Java is evil."

An amusing comp.lang.java.programmer article has Headers
Subject: Re: constructor with more than 255 params
and
Message-ID: <1127383390.117229.283330@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <dgtn42$531@netnews.net.lucent.com>
   <sdq4j151n19sas3ed1j9tqa5st295kdirf@4ax.com>
by Hemal  Pandya . . .
"Roedy Green wrote:
[...]
>
>  Alternatively, put the parameter info into a Collection, perhaps a
> HashMap of name=value pairs and pass in the Collection.

All very good advice. But instead of using the evil data structure
HashMap you might find the named parameter indiom useful:
http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/ctors.html#faq-10.18
"

Ada is absolutely better as normal.

Back to comp.compilers.tools.javacc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: ada to java Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-08-13 15:27 +0200
  Re: ada to java Von Ottone <pnn@pnn.org> - 2025-08-13 15:58 +0200
    Re: ada to java Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-08-13 16:07 +0200
      Re: ada to java Von Ottone <pnn@pnn.org> - 2025-08-13 16:41 +0200
    Re: ada to java Niocláisín Cóilín de Ghlostéir <Spamassassin@irrt.De> - 2025-08-13 17:17 +0200
  Re: ada to java Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-08-13 13:57 -0700

csiph-web