Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
| From | jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.development, comp.arch |
| Subject | Re: Protection rings within applications |
| Date | 2012-04-09 21:08 +0000 |
| Organization | Public Access Networks Corp. |
| Message-ID | <jlvj4n$7oh$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <9u593lF5htU1@mid.individual.net> <jlk5vg$v7g$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In article <jlk5vg$v7g$1@speranza.aioe.org>, Rod Pemberton <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> wrote: >For x86-64, didn't Ring 1 and Ring 2 get tossed out also ... ? No but all the programers said '*please* make it *stop*!'
Back to comp.arch | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Protection rings within applications "Marven Lee" <marven10@gmail.com> - 2012-04-05 11:04 +0100
Re: Protection rings within applications Antoine Leca <root@localhost.invalid> - 2012-04-05 13:56 +0200
Re: Protection rings within applications Morten Reistad <first@last.name> - 2012-04-10 11:02 +0200
Re: Protection rings within applications "Marven Lee" <marven10@gmail.com> - 2012-04-13 10:49 +0100
Re: Protection rings within applications "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-04-05 09:16 -0400
Re: Protection rings within applications BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-04-06 12:05 -0700
Re: Protection rings within applications jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-04-09 21:08 +0000
Re: Protection rings within applications James Harris <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2012-04-05 14:17 -0700
csiph-web