Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #32291
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.arch.embedded |
| Subject | Re: AM623 experiences |
| Date | 2024-11-24 11:42 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <vhuvv3$26ho9$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <vhs301$1klnt$1@dont-email.me> <vhshv0$1mhug$2@dont-email.me> <vhtc3u$1jk$1@reader2.panix.com> <vhtq47$1tfnd$2@dont-email.me> |
On 24/11/2024 00:56, Don Y wrote:
> On 11/23/2024 12:57 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2024-11-23, David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
>>> On 23/11/2024 09:15, Don Y wrote:
>>>> I'm looking to move my design onto said platform.
>>>>
>>>> Any first-hand experiences to share?
>>>>
>>>> Bugs in silicon, toolchain, support, etc.?
>>>
>>> I've no experience with that device at all, but from experience with
>>> other toolchains provided by TI over the years, watch out for zero
>>> initialisation of variables in the bss.
>
> [Hmmm... I don't see your post, David. <frown> Something must be
> hosed in my server. (actually, I don't see MANY posts, here! Quiet?)]
>
I don't think there is anything odd with my posting or the server on my
side (eternal-september). But Grant quoted the most important part of
my post - the rest was more venting than informative!
It /is/ quiet in this newsgroup.
> BSS is a good warning. I've been using other tools with the ARM that
> I've "abandoned" ("moved past" might be a kinder way of reference).
>
> I tend to rely on vendors tools *if* there is likely to be some
> bug that the tools can workaround -- that a third-party vendor
> may not be aware of (or address).
>
ARM is pretty good at making sure they cover all known bugs - so their
gcc toolchain builds tend to have backported patches that are not in the
mainstream gcc source tree until a version or two later. Mistakes can
happen, of course, and you can look at the issue trackers for their
toolchain builds to see some of them. But for the kind of cores in
question here, the microcontroller vendors have little influence over
the cores themselves, and therefore less scope of introducing
vendor-specific bugs.
>> For the cortex M4, I'd avoid using TI's toolchain if at all possible.
>> Download a copy of GCC from ARM.
>
> This is an A53 (ARMv8) -- at least the "main cores" are. There's
> also an M4(F) -- and, as typical of ARM, a couple of other
> "specialty processors".
>
>> The general rule I've found to be true for the past 40 years is that
>> software/tools supplied by silicon vendors is crap.
>
> That's a direct analog of the issues with "sample applications" for
> hardware devices!
>
> What about "support"? Are there anything other than trained monkeys
> available? Or, is everything "forum based" (what a great scam!
> outsource your support to your CUSTOMERS!!)
>
It is not uncommon for vendor employees to take part in these forums
too. It is not actually a bad idea, because it means that when they
answer a customer's question, the answer is available for anyone else
doing a search.
Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
AM623 experiences Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2024-11-23 01:15 -0700
Re: AM623 experiences David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-11-23 13:31 +0100
Re: AM623 experiences Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-23 19:57 +0000
Re: AM623 experiences Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2024-11-23 16:56 -0700
Re: AM623 experiences David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-11-24 11:42 +0100
Re: AM623 experiences David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-11-24 11:33 +0100
Re: AM623 experiences Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-24 17:12 +0000
Re: AM623 experiences Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2024-11-24 14:03 -0700
Re: AM623 experiences David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-11-25 11:41 +0100
Re: AM623 experiences David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-11-25 09:37 +0100
Re: AM623 experiences Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-11-25 15:18 +0000
Re: AM623 experiences David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-11-25 17:33 +0100
Re: AM623 experiences Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2024-11-25 13:47 -0700
Re: AM623 experiences pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2024-11-26 13:10 +0100
csiph-web