Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #32255

Re: Neural Networks (MNIST inference) on the “3-cent” Microcontroller

From David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups comp.arch.embedded
Subject Re: Neural Networks (MNIST inference) on the “3-cent” Microcontroller
Date 2024-10-28 17:50 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <vfofc4$12rki$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <GDBnsQalznyGTjeHEuVJnPScMPMUvCQe@news.usenet.farm> <metfhjl089r3lrmjju7ivsqm8alcuf6u88@4ax.com> <cpbKuNbyJaIKqGhWVrwdXAVlyKMyriQk@news.usenet.farm>

Show all headers | View raw


On 28/10/2024 16:42, D. Ray wrote:
> George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> Depends on whether you mean
> 
> Perhaps you misunderstood me. I’m not the author, I just posted beginning
> of a blog post and provided the link to the rest of it because it seemed
> interesting. The reason I didn’t post a whole thing is because there are
> quite few illustrations.
> 
> Blog post ends with:
> 
> “It is indeed possible to implement MNIST inference with good accuracy
> using one of the cheapest and simplest microcontrollers on the market. A
> lot of memory footprint and processing overhead is usually spent on
> implementing flexible inference engines, that can accomodate a wide range
> of operators and model structures. Cutting this overhead away and reducing
> the functionality to its core allows for astonishing simplification at this
> very low end.
> 
> This hack demonstrates that there truly is no fundamental lower limit to
> applying machine learning and edge inference. However, the feasibility of
> implementing useful applications at this level is somewhat doubtful.”

It's fine to quote from a blog post or other such sources, as long as 
you make it clear that this is what you are doing (and that you are not 
quoting so much that it is copyright infringement).  Your first post in 
this thread was formatted in a way that makes it clear and obvious that 
it was your own original words, written for the Usenet post - but 
apparently that was not the case.  Remember, no one reading Usenet is 
going to click on random links in a post - we need very good reason to 
do so.  So please, next time write some introductory or explanatory text 
yourself and make the whole thing clearer.

I think it is quite cool to hear that it is possible to do something 
like this on these 3-cent microcontrollers, but I would not expect 
anyone to use them in practice.

Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Neural Networks (MNIST inference) on the “3-cent” Microcontroller D. Ray <d@ray> - 2024-10-21 20:06 +0000
  Re: Neural Networks (MNIST inference) on the “3-cent” Microcontroller Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2024-10-21 15:09 -0700
  Re: Neural Networks (MNIST inference) on the “3-cent” Microcontroller George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2024-10-22 15:39 -0400
    Re: Neural Networks (MNIST inference) on the “3-cent” Microcontroller D. Ray <d@ray> - 2024-10-28 15:42 +0000
      Re: Neural Networks (MNIST inference) on the “3-cent” Microcontroller David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-10-28 17:50 +0100
  Re: Neural Networks (MNIST inference) on the “3-cent” Microcontroller olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> - 2024-10-26 20:43 -0500
    Re: Neural Networks (MNIST inference) on the “3-cent” Microcontroller George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2024-10-27 16:41 -0400
    Re: Neural Networks (MNIST inference) on the “3-cent” Microcontroller D. Ray <d@ray> - 2024-10-28 15:42 +0000

csiph-web