Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: David Brown Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded Subject: Re: Improving build system Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 11:17:52 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: <1004bg1$3218k$2@dont-email.me> References: <1001m9t$2drv1$1@dont-email.me> <100338u$2c42e$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 11:17:53 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f822d6a0dfa204727d91915e9cbd5d76"; logging-data="3212564"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+trFL4ad3pCxayWonKp3QEXEmy4MBjYoc=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:AnU9Dg4p4GTnjf61O3ry12ugwso= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB Xref: csiph.com comp.arch.embedded:32426 On 15/05/2025 01:00, Nicolas Paul Colin de Glocester wrote: > Buona sera! > > On Wed, 14 May 2025, pozz wrote: > "[. . .] When it comes to stupid and big IDEs [. . .] > [. . .] > It is already a miracle if that software runs without problems with the default > installation path. I don't want to imagine what happens if I changed it." > > > If these IDEs would not be trustworthy, then you would need to buy good > alternatives. Don't be silly. There /are/ no alternatives that are more trustworthy - they just have different failure or risk points. There can be benefits in buying a commercial IDE, and/or a commercial toolchain, but lower risk of bugs, quirks or installation issues is most certainly not one of them.