Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.arch.arithmetic > #74
| From | Paul Pot <PMD@SIBU.HQ> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool, comp.arch.arithmetic, alt.support.learning-difficulties |
| Subject | Re: ]v[aths for fun and profit... |
| Date | 2014-07-01 00:15 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <losr2r$dv8$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <lork88$231$1@dont-email.me> <mn.f3817de67535b1a1.134914@pompous-donkey-tours.com> <lorrrm$q0a$1@dont-email.me> <mn.f39d7de6f03c512c.134914@pompous-donkey-tours.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Pope Pompous XVIII brought next idea : > Earl Cup submitted this idea : >> Pope Pompous XVIII formulated the question : >>> ]v[etaphoid wrote on 2014-06-30 : >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> A friend and I were having a spirited discussion about arithmetic >>>> in the discussion below. He contends that because Catholics only >>>> allow men priests to molest boys, they are only half as likely as >>>> the general population to be paedophiles, since there are no >>>> women. >>>> >>>> He's such a funny fellow... >>>> >>>> "On a more wholesome note, do you believe that the incidence of >>>> paedophilia amongst Catholic priests would be consistent with >>>> your quoted global incidence rates of 3-4%?" >>>> >>>> "No I don't. I'm not sure you know this but the Catholic >>>> priesthood is for men only. Straight away that reduces the >>>> average by half. I do hope you are able to understand this simple >>>> bit of arithmetic." >>> >>> Yes I could have phrased it better. I also readily admit I've >>> always been useless at maths. >> >> Just maths? Thank heavens we can rely on your rock solid knowledge >> and interpretation of international politics! > > At least I don't walk around with the fanny batter of a 60-year-old > ho bubbling in my nostrils. *splutter*! -- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Back to comp.arch.arithmetic | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
]v[aths for fun and profit... ]v[etaphoid <met@phoid.con> - 2014-06-30 22:12 +1000
Re: ]v[aths for fun and profit... "Mentalguy2k8" <mentalguy2k8@gmail.com> - 2014-06-30 13:35 +0100
Re: ]v[aths for fun and profit... Pope Pompous XVIII <popepompousxviii@popesnews.invalid> - 2014-06-30 14:57 +0100
Re: ]v[aths for fun and profit... ]v[etaphoid <met@phoid.con> - 2014-07-01 00:05 +1000
Re: ]v[aths for fun and profit... Earl Cup <earlcup@yahoo.com> - 2014-07-01 00:22 +1000
Re: ]v[aths for fun and profit... Pope Pompous XVIII <popepompousxviii@popesnews.invalid> - 2014-06-30 15:25 +0100
Re: ]v[aths for fun and profit... Paul Pot <PMD@SIBU.HQ> - 2014-07-01 00:15 +0100
Re: ]v[aths for fun and profit... "Mentalguy2k8" <mentalguy2k8@gmail.com> - 2014-06-30 17:29 +0100
Re: ]v[aths for fun and profit... ]v[etaphoid <met@phoid.con> - 2015-09-24 23:35 +1000
Re: ]v[aths for fun and profit... Prof. ]v[etaphoid <met@phoid.com.canadia> - 2017-11-10 22:53 +1100
csiph-web