X-Received: by 10.42.47.10 with SMTP id m10mr9041634icf.34.1406072832532; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:47:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.222.41 with SMTP id qj9mr486487igc.1.1406072832380; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:47:12 -0700 (PDT) Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!h18no5825107igc.0!news-out.google.com!eg1ni1igc.0!nntp.google.com!h18no5825106igc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.arch.arithmetic Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=198.161.203.6; posting-account=1nOeKQkAAABD2jxp4Pzmx9Hx5g9miO8y NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.161.203.6 User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Correction to Goldschmidt Division Description on Web Page From: Quadibloc Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 23:47:12 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: csiph.com comp.arch.arithmetic:75 Somehow I got confused by some of the references I read, and gave a description of Newton-Raphson division, which is actually a separate technique, as that of Goldschmidt division. I have now corrected the page in question, http://www.quadibloc.com/comp/cp0202.htm to correctly describe both methods individually. John Savard