Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.ai |
| Subject | Re: Word choice "recognizing" (Was: Re: LaTeX for prompting AI?) |
| Date | 2025-07-13 00:09 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <104ujhc$2bkt3$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <0001HW.2E08E9C2000BBE44700002FB038F@news.eternal-september.org> <103adm7$102uv$1@dont-email.me> <076a47e8-65f6-4323-91fc-0b6ce7e11306@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> <104nu4s$p35l$1@dont-email.me> |
On 10/07/2025 09:38, Tristan Miller wrote: > Greetings. > > On 2025-07-10 07:26, Tristan Wibberley wrote: >>> [Just now, ChatGPT] had no problem recognizing equations written in >>> LaTeX markup. >> ... "recognizing" ... implies mind via "cognize". Is "recognizing" >> an accepted technical term for LLMs or should we say "predicting from" >> ? > ["recognize"] has been used > academically in the context of AI systems since long before the advent > of LLMs, and has even become entrenched in popular usage through terms > such as "speech recognition" and "facial recognition". There are even > plenty of computational but non-AI uses going back to the 1950s -- books > and articles write of computers "recognizing" magnetically encoded bits > on a storage medium, or symbols in a computer program, or numbers within > a certain range. Thanks for the detailed and helpful response. It seems those uses of "recognize" and "recognition" are specifically for classification and, typically, classification of an input as a representation of a specific symbol. Do you find that normally a face is said to be recognized when the system provides a name, classified when it provides a species, detected when it provides an assertion of presence? I wonder if "recognize" is properly applied to LLM prediction of a statement that asserts a specific member of a class rather than for just any useful prediction or for prediction of any classifying statement in general? That continues to raise some interesting questions. If you ask "is [code] latex?" and the system responds "yes", did it even get as far as 'classifying' the code as latex? Did the system merely admit it to a "similar-to-latex" set rather than discriminating the code from other things from which you would expect it to be discriminated when it is classified? -- Tristan
Back to comp.ai | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
LaTeX for prompting AI? David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> - 2025-06-22 22:15 -0400
Re: LaTeX for prompting AI? Tristan Miller <psychonaut@nothingisreal.com> - 2025-06-22 22:21 -0400
Word choice "recognizing" (Was: Re: LaTeX for prompting AI?) Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2025-07-10 01:26 -0400
Re: Word choice "recognizing" (Was: Re: LaTeX for prompting AI?) Tristan Miller <psychonaut@nothingisreal.com> - 2025-07-10 04:38 -0400
Re: Word choice "recognizing" (Was: Re: LaTeX for prompting AI?) Tristan Wibberley <tristan.wibberley+netnews2@alumni.manchester.ac.uk> - 2025-07-13 00:09 -0400
Re: Word choice "recognizing" (Was: Re: LaTeX for prompting AI?) Tristan Miller <psychonaut@nothingisreal.com> - 2025-07-13 20:11 -0400
csiph-web