Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Andy Burns Newsgroups: comp.ai.shells Subject: Re: Chatbots produce bogus citations Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 06:07:17 +0100 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <1qbffa5.1adff801ndrrcbN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <1qbnhi9.3p966e1nlu1yjN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <1qbnyg1.11uoqwl1ybtsjsN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <9s8gM.975$tol1.585@fx09.iad> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net aPWDKOudxnYAliHsx/63YgM0ukw/XFKCI2XO3kkbfVECAYNBzF Cancel-Lock: sha1:sc9jPWe7P8yfU9YqTDTND+0NFe4= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.2 Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <9s8gM.975$tol1.585@fx09.iad> Xref: csiph.com comp.ai.shells:258 vallor wrote: > So is that the last word on these AI shells? I still > use them, even though the novelty has worn off a bit. (I'd > still be much more interested if they were "answer machines" > instead of "say what sounds good" machines. :) > > I don't trust them, but do verify them -- and I recommend > others do the same. I don't use them, though I do notice those people who test them out, or believe in the answers blindly, also those who used to be paid to develop them turning against them ... maybe it'll take a multi-million dollar lawsuit to make them go away for a decade?