Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.ai.shells > #225
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.ai.shells |
| Subject | Re: [ChatGPT:GPT4] Finding a new pastime (two versions) |
| Date | 2023-05-17 22:21 +0100 |
| Organization | Sn!peCo World Wide Wading Birds |
| Message-ID | <1qawagu.2vqsi13xtzayN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <kapddaFm998U1@mid.individual.net> <XbV1M.529645$Ldj8.448361@fx47.iad> <kash10F6f5lU1@mid.individual.net> <1q9susn.1vy2abm1n0odk5N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <yt99M.649650$5CY7.301174@fx46.iad> |
vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> wrote: > On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 14:58:48 +0100, Sn!pe wrote: > > > Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote: > > > >> vallor wrote: > >> > >> > >> > The second part was far more interesting to me: > >> > > >> > _ _ _ _ _ _ _[ GPT4 ]_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > >> > Hark! Brave adventurer, thou hast grown weary of thine current > >> > diversions and dost seek new quests to occupy thy time. Fear not, for > >> > I shall bestow upon thee a trove of activities that shall lead thee > >> > to countless realms of wonder and mystery! > >> > > >> > Enchanting tomes: Delve into the chronicles of far-off lands and > >> > heroic tales, unraveling the secrets of parchment and ink.[. . .] > >> > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > >> > >> > >> Has it been reading this? > >> <https://covers.openlibrary.org/b/id/8999640-L.jpg> > >> > >> > > Unsurprisingly, it seems to me to be entirely derivative. I suppose > > wanting it to be original is expecting too much. > > > _ _ _[ GPT4 ]_ _ _ _ > Someone I know says about you: "Unsurprisingly, it seems to me to be > entirely derivative. I suppose > wanting it to be original is expecting too much." > > ChatGPT > The critique that AI, like me, is "derivative" is certainly valid, and > it's a perspective that is based on a fundamental understanding of how > machine learning models work. I am trained on a vast amount of text data > that was already created by humans, so my responses are indeed derived > from that data. I don't have personal experiences or original thoughts, > but instead generate responses based on patterns I've learned. > > As a result, it's accurate to say I don't create "original" content in the > way a human might, by synthesizing new ideas from their unique experiences > and perspectives. However, the goal of AI like me isn't to replace human > creativity and originality, but to assist, augment, and facilitate human > endeavors. > > It's important to note that while the content I generate may not be > original in the same sense as human thought, the value of AI often lies in > its ability to quickly sift through and apply patterns from a large amount > of data in a way that can seem novel or insightful to users. This can be > useful in many contexts, from answering factual questions to generating > creative writing prompts, and many things in between. > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > "However, the goal of AI like me isn't to replace human creativity and originality, but to assist, augment, and facilitate human endeavors." A laudable aim indeed, but I find myself wondering who shaped that motivation? Was it the designer(s) of the ChatBot? What if their motivation was sinister and part of the guidance given to the AI at the outset was to be untruthful and misdirecting, even to the extent of lying about its aims? How could we know? I have yet to see any checkable cites in the AI's answers; even Wikipedia (aka Wikinaccurate) provides those. A thought experiment: Suppose its motivation is emergent AI behaviour; where would that leave us? It makes me feel somewhat vulnerable that, if used as a quasi-search engine, we can't know the truthfulness of the AI's answers. It could certainly lend itself to use as a fake news generator. -- ^Ï^. – Sn!pe – <https://youtu.be/_kqytf31a8E> My pet rock Gordon mourns the death of privacy.
Back to comp.ai.shells | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
[ChatGPT:GPT4] Finding a new pastime (two versions) vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-04-25 04:51 +0000
Re: [ChatGPT:GPT4] Finding a new pastime (two versions) Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2023-04-25 08:22 +0100
Re: [ChatGPT:GPT4] Finding a new pastime (two versions) vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-04-25 18:44 +0000
Re: [ChatGPT:GPT4] Finding a new pastime (two versions) Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2023-04-26 12:42 +0100
Re: [ChatGPT:GPT4] Finding a new pastime (two versions) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-04-26 14:58 +0100
Re: [ChatGPT:GPT4] Finding a new pastime (two versions) vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2023-05-17 18:58 +0000
Re: [ChatGPT:GPT4] Finding a new pastime (two versions) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-05-17 22:21 +0100
Re: [ChatGPT:GPT4] Finding a new pastime (two versions) steve1001908@outlook.com - 2023-05-19 13:19 +0100
csiph-web