Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register


Groups > comp.ai.alife > #253

Re: Is this group dead?

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com>
Newsgroups comp.ai.alife
Subject Re: Is this group dead?
Date Wed, 17 Sep 2025 18:07:18 +0100
Organization Frantic
Message-ID <86348lkny1.fsf@example.com> (permalink)
References <108fu8b$31qum$1@dont-email.me> <20250914175142.19b467283cde7f59f7be2464@chimia.se>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
Injection-Info solani.org; logging-data="553271"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:I/GuVVJNqGp3yNBmz+0O0S3NE5E= sha1:lMBiTkDwZfoYonoYBn9A7afiBo0=
X-User-ID eJwNy8EBwCAIA8CVAjWEjqNQ9h/B3v/4hEVpBWNxON3Ue2r30LBkGCndsb0BkGVf/gGnXKWTFxhWELw=
Xref csiph.com comp.ai.alife:253

Show key headers only | View raw


peter london <peterlondon@chimia.se> writes:

> On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 20:55:39 -0000 (UTC)
> boltar@caprica.universe wrote:
>
>> Given how AI has come along in leaps and bounds the last few years
>> surely there's some artificial life possibilities with them?
>> 
> I guess this group is kept mostly for historical reasons, and we're
> supposed to use comp.ai for discussions which is even moderated it
> seems.
>
> This group seems to have junk it it mostly :D.
>
> Cheers

I am here. Managing to be on topic, I got claude.ai to write a Conway
Life program in C and it works pretty well.

Back to comp.ai.alife | PreviousPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Is this group dead? boltar@caprica.universe - 2025-08-24 20:55 +0000
  Re: Is this group dead? peter london <peterlondon@chimia.se> - 2025-09-14 17:51 +0200
    Re: Is this group dead? Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> - 2025-09-17 18:07 +0100

csiph-web