Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register


Groups > ca.general > #3196

Re: Court overturns California black criminal's murder conviction, citing state's new 'rap lyrics' law

From Franz Xaver Kroetz <fxk@gmail.com>
References <p3fhfglj2tpr7catoif19o53m7uu9tcspj@4ax.com> <XYSdnUVdM9xvdGX9nZ2dnUU7-SudnZ2d@giganews.com> <sdbun9$g1t$1@dont-email.me> <ivqjfghjcofdvqec5uqbf38dfet9sahl8v@4ax.com> <sm17pl$bhh$78@news.dns-netz.com>
Message-ID <209ec4883e342e0b71ea0afec496ca0f@dizum.com> (permalink)
Date 2023-04-19 11:39 +0200
Subject Re: Court overturns California black criminal's murder conviction, citing state's new 'rap lyrics' law
Newsgroups alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, ca.general, sac.politics, soc.culture.african.american, talk.politics.guns

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 04 Nov 2021, Trump 2020 <rapinroymoosre@excite.com> posted some
news:sm17pl$bhh$78@news.dns-netz.com: 

> Susan Cohen wrote
> 
>> 
>> No it's not prejudicial, you assholes.  He's a fucking nigger rapper
>> and a criminal. 

An appellate court in Riverside, California, overturned the murder 
conviction of a man who was sentenced to 129 years to life in prison, 
ruling in part that the use of a rap video as evidence in this case 
violates the state's new "Decriminalizing Artistic Expression Act" – a 
landmark law, which was signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom on Sept. 31, 2022.

Travon Rashan Venable, Sr., was convicted of first degree murder and 
attempted murder in connection to a 2014 drive-by shooting. He pleaded not 
guilty.

According to court documents obtained by ABC News, prosecutors alleged 
that Venable and a fellow gang member were involved in a drive-by 
shooting. Venable was accused of driving the car while his co-defendant 
fired shots.

The appellate court judge ruled in a Feb. 17 opinion obtained by ABC News 
that the "admission of the rap video without the new safeguards was 
prejudicial to Venable" and the prosecution's emphasis on the rap video 
during the trial "likely had an effect on the outcome."

The court ruled that although the law wasn't in effect during Venable's 
trial, it applies retroactively to cases that are not final and under 
appeal.

The court reversed the conviction and remanded Venable’s case for a new 
trial.

The ruling came after the California Supreme Court transferred the case 
back to the appellate court to reconsider the case in light of the new 
law.

Jacquelyn Rodriguez, the public affairs officer for the San Bernardino 
District Attorney's office, which prosecuted this case, told ABC News on 
Wednesday that Venable's case is "the first case in the state that has 
been reversed due to the new law."

"Right now we're in a waiting phase to see if the appellate court will 
give jurisdiction back to us," she added.

The video
According to court documents obtained by ABC News, prosecutors introduced 
a YouTube video found by police where Venable and other members of the 
California Gardens gang are seen "flashing gang signs" and displaying 
"guns, drugs, and money."

Prosecutors alleged that a rap in the video, "Got word from a bird[] that 
they did that [racial slur] dead wrong/Slid up Medical and left that 
[racial slur] head gone," was boasting about the drive-by shooting, but 
according to court documents, Venable didn’t say anything in the video.

“Nothing in the song indicates the rapper or others in the video had 
personal knowledge or involvement in the shooting, only that they had 
heard about it,” the court’s opinion said.

In the ruling the court pointed to testimony from a gang expert who 
testified that the gang as a whole took credit for the shooting.

"There is substantial doubt whether the trial judge would have admitted 
the video evidence under the new standard, and it's clear the prosecution 
used that evidence to tie Venable to the specific crime. The remaining 
evidence of Venable's involvement was not strong," the court wrote in the 
opinion, pointing to testimony from Venable's aunt who provided him with 
an alibi and testimony from "a police informant who gave a series of 
conflicting accounts of the incident and had testified Venable was being 
framed."

Venable's attorney Jim Gass, who objected to the inclusion of the rap 
video as evidence, told ABC News in a statement on Wednesday "this is the 
type of case that created the need for the new evidence code regarding rap 
lyrics."

"The conviction was overturned because the appellate court could see that 
there was very little evidence against Venable other than the video," he 
added.

The new law
The California law, which was dubbed the "rap lyrics bill," became the 
state's Evidence Code section 352.2 and seeks to ensure that "creative 
expression will not be used to introduce stereotypes or activate bias 
against the defendant, nor as character or propensity evidence," according 
to the text of the law.

In reversing and remanding Venable's conviction, the court wrote, "It's 
uncontested the trial judge did not consider those additional factors 
before admitting a rap video in Venable's trial and that the trial, as a 
result, didn't comply with the new requirements for admission."

Rap lyrics have been used by prosecutors in the U.S. for decades as 
evidence in criminal cases, helping put rappers behind bars. But it wasn't 
until lyrics were used in the May 2022 indictment of Grammy-winning rapper 
Young Thug on gang-related charges that the controversial practice sparked 
a movement in the music industry to "Protect Black Art," and fueled a wave 
of support for legislation seeking to limit the practice.

The California bill is the first legislation that explicitly sets 
guidelines for the the use of rap lyrics in court to be signed into law in 
the U.S.

Similar bills that seek to set guidelines that could limit the use of rap 
lyrics in court have been introduced in states like Maryland, New York, 
New Jersey and Missouri, and a federal bill, known as the "Rap Act," was 
introduced in Congress last year.

Some outline more restrictive guidelines than others, but the bills 
essentially limit the use of rap lyrics in court by requiring a judge to 
consider whether there's a factual link between the lyrics and the alleged 
crime and whether introducing the song or video could inject racial bias 
into the case.

Rodriguez said that if Venable's case comes back to the Superior Court, 
the DA's office "would review it," and consider the new law.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/court-overturns-california-mans-murder-
conviction-citing-states/story?id=97523648

Back to ca.general | Previous | Next | Find similar


Thread

Re: Court overturns California black criminal's murder conviction, citing state's new 'rap lyrics' law Franz Xaver Kroetz <fxk@gmail.com> - 2023-04-19 11:39 +0200

csiph-web