Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > aus.computers > #47111
| From | Max <max@val.morgan> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: security with XP |
| Date | 2015-07-16 18:08 +0800 |
| Organization | news.aioe.org |
| Message-ID | <mo7vqf$oki$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <mo203j$vdr$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mo59jc$tjc$1@dont-email.me> <mo5tgm$ek1$1@speranza.aioe.org> <d0nkv2F4hj8U1@mid.individual.net> <mo6qm7$gp8$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) Wrote in message: > Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote: >> Max <max@val.morgan> wrote: >>> >>> XP may still be used by some silly people but it poses an unacceptable >>> security risk because it doesn't get updates anymore. >> >> As Rod hinted at, one can still get security updates for XP (till >> 2019) if one really wants. A bit of Googling is all it takes. > > Actually all it takes is reading the reply I posted to him (and which he > replied to) a month ago, where I provided a link. > A registry hack to impersonate the POS version of Win is not really a solution people want. How do you even know you will get all the right updates?
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: security with XP "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 06:21 +1000
Re: security with XP "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-07-14 11:36 +0800
Re: security with XP "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2015-07-14 14:45 +1000
Re: security with XP Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-14 19:27 +0000
Re: security with XP Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 09:59 +1000
Re: security with XP "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 10:58 +1000
Re: security with XP "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-07-15 10:31 +0800
Re: security with XP "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-15 15:52 +1000
Re: security with XP "jonz" <me@there.com> - 2015-07-27 14:50 +1000
Re: security with XP "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2015-07-27 14:53 +1000
Re: security with XP "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-27 15:12 +1000
Re: security with XP "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2015-07-27 20:22 +1000
Re: security with XP "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2015-07-28 07:23 +1000
Re: security with XP "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-28 08:28 +1000
Re: security with XP "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2015-07-28 09:22 +1000
Re: security with XP "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-28 09:28 +1000
Re: security with XP "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2015-07-28 11:42 +1000
Re: security with XP "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-30 17:35 +1000
Re: security with XP "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2015-07-30 19:36 +1000
Re: security with XP "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-31 07:17 +1000
Re: security with XP "Damian" <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> - 2015-07-15 19:38 +1000
Re: security with XP Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-15 17:52 +0000
Re: security with XP not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2015-07-15 23:34 +0000
Re: security with XP Max <max@val.morgan> - 2015-07-16 18:08 +0800
Re: security with XP Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-16 19:48 +0000
Re: security with XP "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 06:11 +1000
Re: security with XP Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-16 19:45 +0000
Re: security with XP bruce56@topmail.co.nz - 2015-07-30 17:11 -0700
Re: security with XP "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 04:41 +1000
Re: security with XP Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-15 18:52 +0000
Re: security with XP "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 10:30 +1000
Re: security with XP F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2015-07-18 20:53 +1000
Re: security with XP Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-07-18 19:40 +0000
Re: security with XP "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 07:24 +1000
csiph-web