Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: aus.computers
Subject: Re: Telstra cancelling dial up services
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 12:09:25 +1000
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <err2usF6eupU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <d46schF5e5nU1@mid.individual.net>   <ohclpf$1tck$1@gioia.aioe.org> <epu7opF4rjsU1@mid.individual.net> <ohfig2$f6a$1@gioia.aioe.org> <eq1dmuFqtpkU1@mid.individual.net> <ohi5n6$69q$1@gioia.aioe.org> <eq3mekFcbilU1@mid.individual.net> <ohn6f0$1uim$1@gioia.aioe.org> <eq8noeFh69iU1@mid.individual.net> <ohpqqc$bo2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <eqbga7F63nlU1@mid.individual.net> <oi24hb$sah$1@gioia.aioe.org> <equ6svFf1t5U1@mid.individual.net> <oieu0c$1ppj$1@gioia.aioe.org> <er0j9vF1jgcU1@mid.individual.net> <oihike$4o0$2@gioia.aioe.org> <er7ut8Fi0mdU1@mid.individual.net> <oin2nk$set$1@gioia.aioe.org> <er8inkFlbmpU1@mid.individual.net> <ois4of$s99$1@gioia.aioe.org> <erdnhrFkin4U1@mid.individual.net> <oiuol1$11n3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ergbf7F5hpbU2@mid.individual.net> <oj1cps$1bic$1@gioia.aioe.org> <erjb83Fd114U1@mid.individual.net> <oj41s2$1uof$1@gioia.aioe.org> <erlmi1Fto8fU1@mid.individual.net> <oj6ucg$tn7$1@gioia.aioe.org> <erqga7F2it0U1@mid.individual.net> <oj9g87$up2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net Zq6mIrpqJAA7PBAv1polTw1jgGy/DBFWH37kBgBTbTjPzNCQc=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IUFjZ12yks7u03Rir8LSjwosOH4=
In-Reply-To: <oj9g87$up2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
Xref: csiph.com aus.computers:60386



"Computer Nerd Kev" <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote in message 
news:oj9g87$up2$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> "Computer Nerd Kev" <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> "Computer Nerd Kev" <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Computer Nerd Kev" <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Computer Nerd Kev" <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "Computer Nerd Kev" <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote
>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Oh go on Speedy. There's clearly a finite number of meaningful
>>>>>>>>> statements that you could be told, it's just a case of us both
>>>>>>>>> surviving the millennia it will take to tell you them all at
>>>>>>>>> one per day.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> True, there's always a chance I could pop up with it at any
>>>>>>> moment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.
>>>>>
>>>>> No I see, the statement to defeat you would be one without
>>>>> meaning. Something with such little degree of contention that
>>>>> it would be impossible to call that contention into disrepute.
>>>>
>>>> You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.
>>>
>>> Well indeed, my intentions in making such a statement would have
>>> already been made clear in context, so that would provide an
>>> matter to dispute even if there was no contention in the statement
>>> itself.
>>
>> You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.
>
> Well I guess I can understand if you're a bit bitter about intentions,
> those which you had for this line of reply clearly haven't worked
> out as envisaged.

You never could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.