Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: felix Newsgroups: aus.computers,aus.politics,aus.cars Subject: Re: Fake Felix found Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 16:25:34 +1100 Lines: 51 Message-ID: References: <588c0439$0$34513$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 6/hR/kb3bBPYzanu67Z93g3qw/9VqvKJqdCl05/z8uAnzdFqwF Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZEwFXWVQlUu8yEWsDOJj582o0HE= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 In-Reply-To: <588c0439$0$34513$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> Xref: csiph.com aus.computers:57761 aus.politics:592275 aus.cars:244828 On Saturday, 28 Jan 2017 1:38 PM, F Murtz wrote: > Noddy wrote: >> On 28/01/17 2:20 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote: >>> Noddy wrote: >>>> On 28/01/17 12:14 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Further, if a person was to post an image of someone to a form of >>>>>> social >>>>>> media like Usenet for example, where the image itself was taken from >>>>>> *another* form of social media like Facebook then they aren't doing >>>>>> anything that hasn't been done already. >>>>> >>>>> What is being done all the time isn't the point. The point is >>>>> what is >>>>> legal and what's not. >>>> >>>> Indeed, but then in this case you're talking about an image someone >>>> has >>>> made publicly available without any caveats which anyone could view >>>> for >>>> themselves if they so desired that was linked to and posted to another >>>> form of social media. >>> >>> As has been mentioned, it's not about the *viewing* - which is OK, >>> because it was not protected against such use - but about *copying*. >> >> Yeah, I'm not agreeing with you. >> >> Had the image been taken from some private account that only Felix had >> access to *then* I would accept what you say as correct. But because the >> image was uploaded to Facebook and marked as "public" by Grumpy Tech, he >> had given Facebook permission for it to be made available for other >> people to do with as they wish in accordance with Facebook's terms and >> conditions which he agrees with as part of his holding of an account. >> >> He may still own the photo, but he's given permission for it to be used >> by uploading it. >> >> >> > I get the impression that the image was not from grumpys page but from > a friends page no, from grumpy's page -- "It's not Islamophobia when they really are trying to kill you" http://www.barenakedislam.com/ http://www.thereligionofpeace.com