Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #53069
| From | keithr0 <user@account.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: Fibre connections |
| Date | 2016-06-03 19:53 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <drd2f8Fm6k3U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <574e5fd0$0$9292$c3e8da3$5d8fb80f@news.astraweb.com> |
On 1/06/2016 2:08 PM, F Murtz wrote: > Any one know the finer points of actual connection of FTTN ,IE. max > distance from node to house, are nodes put at existing connection > pillars, do they have more nodes than existing pillars? Are distance > from node to house longer in areas of sparse population,IE. will they > then get worse than general population's service? Around here, they put an NBN box adjacent to each Telstra pillar. Quite a lot of pillars were then extended, I presume that they added connections to the NBN box so that to move a connection to the NBN, they just need to move the consumers pair from the Telstra connection to the NBN one.
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Fibre connections F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2016-06-01 14:08 +1000
Re: Fibre connections "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 05:47 +1000
Re: Fibre connections Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 11:09 +1000
Re: Fibre connections news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2016-06-02 02:56 +0000
Re: Fibre connections Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 13:48 +1000
Re: Fibre connections Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-06-02 15:04 +1000
Re: Fibre connections Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 14:07 +1000
Re: Fibre connections maxnews23@gmail.com - 2016-06-24 06:28 -0700
Re: Fibre connections news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2016-06-25 04:12 +0000
Re: Fibre connections keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2016-06-03 19:53 +1000
Re: Fibre connections Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 20:51 +1000
csiph-web