Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #52755
| From | Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers, aus.comms |
| Subject | Re: Best low use mobile plan |
| Date | 2016-05-18 17:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dq3ldkFd30tU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <u98fjblav8v0c7qrr44k4ce5jlp5oquat8@4ax.com> <dpufuoFb7n7U1@mid.individual.net> <afnkjbd0pknvju53lu9vaertrcq9vpg17g@4ax.com> <dq18vsFsnsbU1@mid.individual.net> <nhgkd7$n4c$4@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
news16 <news16@woa.com.au> wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2016 19:16:12 +0000, Frank Slootweg wrote: > > > General advice: If you're on Telstra, get a Telstra device with a > > 'Blue Tick' marking. They've better reception in low signal situations. > > Been there, done that, got the T-shirt. (Translation: Successful > > 'emergency' call to 000, some 40kms from the nearest tower.) > > Did you use any external antenna for that? > That is about the only reason for keeping the ZTE even though it has been > useless in past. No I didn't have/use an external antenna. And it indeed was a ZTE one, the Telstra T95 to be precise. However I did have to stretch my arm up high and use the phone on speaker. Walking a few tens of meters made the difference between signal and no signal. A few years later, I stopped at the exact same spot (had the coordinates in my GPS) and had the exact same coverage/non-coverage experience. Quite interesting/weird.
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Best low use mobile plan "Max" <max@no.email> - 2016-05-14 19:22 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Max" <max@no.email> - 2016-05-14 19:23 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 03:29 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2016-05-15 02:50 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 16:26 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Max" <max@no.email> - 2016-05-15 17:50 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-16 04:24 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2016-05-15 23:52 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2016-05-16 22:41 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 06:15 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2016-05-20 03:22 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-20 15:32 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2016-05-20 08:26 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-20 18:44 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-20 20:40 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2016-05-20 23:45 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-15 19:44 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-14 21:46 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Max" <max@no.email> - 2016-05-14 22:01 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-05-14 17:12 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Max" <max@no.email> - 2016-05-15 09:32 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-05-15 19:42 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2016-05-15 02:51 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-05-15 19:42 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-15 21:08 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-15 21:10 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2016-05-15 12:42 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-05-15 08:09 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 10:26 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 16:05 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Max" <max@no.email> - 2016-05-15 17:51 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-16 04:25 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 03:29 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-15 07:36 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 15:49 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-15 15:56 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-16 04:22 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-16 07:36 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Max" <max@no.email> - 2016-05-15 09:31 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2016-05-15 02:58 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 16:37 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2016-05-16 00:04 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 15:54 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-15 19:41 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-16 04:26 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-16 07:38 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 05:43 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-19 07:09 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-19 07:46 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-19 07:50 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 14:13 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-19 14:22 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 20:03 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-19 21:09 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-20 03:36 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-20 07:44 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-20 20:36 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 14:12 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 14:10 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2016-05-15 02:55 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 16:34 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Max" <max@no.email> - 2016-05-15 20:42 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-16 04:31 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Max" <max@no.email> - 2016-05-16 07:30 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-19 05:42 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Max" <max@no.email> - 2016-05-15 20:45 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-16 04:33 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-05-15 08:07 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2016-05-15 08:38 +0800
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-15 11:30 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-05-15 13:17 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 16:10 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-15 19:43 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-16 04:28 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-05-15 13:14 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2016-05-15 20:41 +0800
Re: Best low use mobile plan Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-05-16 17:56 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2016-05-16 22:53 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-05-17 10:02 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-17 10:52 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-05-17 13:07 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-17 14:43 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-05-18 09:24 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2016-05-18 14:09 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-05-17 19:16 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-05-18 09:24 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan keithr <user@account.invalid> - 2016-05-18 20:05 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-05-19 06:18 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-05-18 20:59 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Jeßus <j@j.j> - 2016-05-25 08:08 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan news16 <news16@woa.com.au> - 2016-05-18 02:35 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2016-05-18 17:00 +0000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Max" <max@no.email> - 2016-05-15 10:28 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 16:07 +1000
Re: Best low use mobile plan Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2016-05-15 20:43 +0800
Re: Best low use mobile plan "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2016-05-16 04:45 +1000
csiph-web