Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Frank Slootweg Newsgroups: aus.computers,comp.mobile.ipad Subject: Re: Apple have stolen my iPAD and the receipt for it as a new item. Date: 12 Apr 2016 21:35:00 GMT Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <110420161832082317%nospam@nospam.invalid> <110420161922082326%nospam@nospam.invalid> <110420162049467794%nospam@nospam.invalid> <110420162300479453%nospam@nospam.invalid> <120420161600139384%nospam@nospam.invalid> X-Trace: individual.net 4ym4wcgR1yzfTr+9C9mp/gkOvi3grhv1YUANCjoYbgoOJDWo9W X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:PU8lArqLxFSz4fB9uAWILxVk5UM= User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-6.2-WOW64/1.5.22(0.156/4/2) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 160412-1, 04/12/2016), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com aus.computers:51733 comp.mobile.ipad:55392 nospam wrote: > In article , Frank Slootweg > wrote: > > > > > By definition, if it's a fake email address, they can't receive > > > > any email that is sent to that fake email address. If they > > > > could, it would be a real email address, not a fake one. > > > > > > nope. a fake email address is one that has fake credentials rather than > > > a real name. > > > > 'nospam' redefines the meaning of "fake email address". So the > > world is full of 'fake' email addresses. And 'nospam' himself is also > > fake! ... *wait* a minute! ... *Now* I get it! > > there's a difference between a working email that has fake information > and a bogus email that does not work at all. Mr. Duh!, I bow to your eternal wisdom!