Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > aus.computers.linux > #19
| From | tinman <vahnqs8qs@mozmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers.linux |
| Subject | Re: Linux apps and workflows |
| Date | 2023-01-15 14:19 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <tq1217$2c2ct$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <06575e19-cf0f-49f6-9e2f-ed7957bf13a4@googlegroups.com> |
On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 16:14:31 -0800 (PST), tmelmosfire wrote: > In COLA there has been a discussion on how Linux helps people with > workflows, specifically in how it sets an environment which lifts > programs above the lowest common denominator or provides tools and > incentives to help those programs rise above it. > > Ronb brought up Scrivener but then he could not think of ways it did > this. Someone else showed many ways Scrivener rises above the lowest > common denominator on Mac OS X. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkaSjCpbwuQ&feature=youtu.be > > Are there ways Scrivener is somehow "special" on Linux? How about other > applications? LibreOffice was also discussed and not much was said for > it. > > Looking for any examples of where Linux does this. > > TYIA If you mean that Scivener is somehow treated differently than other applications on Linux, then no, it is not "special." What that might mean is that Linux is very customizable, due to being free/open source, and so a custom workflow can be created (i.e. choosing a different window manager/compositor, using different applications, etc). What defines "rising above the lowest common denominator?"
Back to aus.computers.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Linux apps and workflows tmelmosfire@gmail.com - 2017-01-11 16:14 -0800 Re: Linux apps and workflows tinman <vahnqs8qs@mozmail.com> - 2023-01-15 14:19 +0000
csiph-web