Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.sys.pdp10 > #9778
| From | Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.sys.pdp10, alt.folklore.computers, openwatcom.users.c_cpp, comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ |
| Date | 2025-11-02 13:08 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10e8dnp$2bc04$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <hkba74$355$1@naig.caltech.edu> <IU.D20100322.T095617.P22846.Q0@J.de.Boyne.Pollard.localhost> <80otshFelcU2@mid.individual.net> <4ba90730.29070015@news.xs4all.nl> <hob9tl$dq7$1@naig.caltech.edu> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 3/23/10 13:56, glen herrmannsfeldt wrote: > In alt.sys.pdp10 Richard Bos <raltbos@xs4all.nl> wrote: > (snip) > >> That crossposting was, for once, not asinine. It served as a nice >> example why, even now, Leenux weenies are not correct when they insist >> that C has a flat memory model and all pointers are just numbers. > This is true often enough to be dangerous when it turns out not to be. > Well, you could also read the C standard to learn that. > > There are additional complications for C on the PDP-10. > > -- glen
Back to alt.sys.pdp10 | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-11-02 13:08 -0700
csiph-web