Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.spam |
| Subject | Re: When did on become off? |
| Date | 2020-09-14 16:23 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20200914162346.1d127ca50e6b7e3b46e5a1dc@g{oogle}mail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <busplf5f76h3d8vgua9065gm1a0n2lfpo1@4ax.com> |
Steve Hayes: > For most of my life the normal prepositions to follow > "based" were "on" or "in". > > But suddenly everyone seems to be talking about things > being "based off" something or somewhere. When did that > happen? > > I can understand "based off" in a context like "The radio > station was based off the coast of Germany, on an island > in the Baltic." But there's still an "on" in the sentence. > > But "based off" sounds a little, well, off base. Indeed. I think the "off" in "based off" performs the same function as it does in "spin-off" and "offspring", whereas "on" is of course the right and literary preposition for "based", evoking the metaphor of a building stating on a fundament. -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ http://preview.tinyurl.com/qcy6mjc [archived]
Back to alt.spam | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: When did on become off? Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2020-09-14 16:23 +0300
csiph-web