Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.os.linux.mint > #47139
| From | Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux.mint |
| Subject | Re: Sick HTPC |
| Date | 2026-04-19 17:03 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10s3fva$92el$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <10rnq54$r1cv$1@dont-email.me> <20260416201429.90b2771896e16cf82cabf286@gmail.com> <10rrj3h$1vvpn$1@dont-email.me> <20260418220233.ac08e2cf5a106306e4459f7a@gmail.com> <20260419214446.800c80cd1824f87887a56f4f@gmail.com> |
On Sun, 4/19/2026 4:44 PM, pinnerite wrote: > > It is isn't. Despite the new kernel, the mouse cursor suddenly went > slow and the MythTV couldfn't get live TV. A reboot fixed it. For a > while. This has been going on for a fe years. I could nevedr pin down > the cause. But is now pretty old so a rebuild is imminent. Did you take a look at "top" ? There was one Promise brand chip, years ago, that could jam the interrupt line and any running OS would then rely on its interrupt limiter behavior, to have an CPU left to respond to any other activity on the machine. Not many hardware devices have had defects like that. Not all the Promise chips for that part number had the defect, so there might have been a timing element to the behavior. I don't know what tool would give a picture of interrupt activity. On Windows, using Process Explorer, there is a line labeled "Hardware Interrupts and DPCs", where a DPC is a Delay Procedure Call which is the Ring 3 portion of interrupt handling, while Ring 0 is the Hardware Interrupt component. Minimal time is spent in the Hardware Interrupt, whereas the DPC execution time might be 10x longer as it is doing the actual service response (adding elements to a ring buffer or similar). You would have to look for the similar elements on Linux and what tool can read that portion out. There aren't too many cases in hardware, where the actual clock rate of the CPU was defective. There might have been a couple Dell laptops where that was going on. I would think something interrupt related (like an issue with the video card interrupts) is a more likely kind of scenario. Oh, yeah, the Dell one was called "ThrottleGate" because the clock would slow down, but it would not speed up later. The document prepared by the person suffering from the problem, was removed from the Internet, which is why you might have trouble finding the details of that. Paul
Back to alt.os.linux.mint | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Sick HTPC pinnerite <pinnerite@gmail.com> - 2026-04-14 21:08 +0100
Re: Sick HTPC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-04-15 06:43 -0400
Re: Sick HTPC pinnerite <pinnerite@gmail.com> - 2026-04-16 20:14 +0100
Re: Sick HTPC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-04-16 17:08 -0400
Re: Sick HTPC pinnerite <pinnerite@gmail.com> - 2026-04-18 22:02 +0100
Re: Sick HTPC pinnerite <pinnerite@gmail.com> - 2026-04-19 21:44 +0100
Re: Sick HTPC Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2026-04-19 17:03 -0400
Re: Sick HTPC Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid> - 2026-04-16 22:58 -0700
csiph-web