Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Mike Easter <MikeE@ster.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.mint,alt.os.linux.ubuntu,alt.os.linux.mageia,alt.os.linux.pclinuxos
Subject: Re: Lists in LibreOffice write
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 09:22:43 -0800
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <msvaf3F85csU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <20260116170956.1c2286ca443f22c3bf3b9743@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net ZWhzG+Q6VDzmh05ZSko+9ggahA1yCQRL3OUl8VyJpeEhCt2UyQ
Cancel-Lock: sha1:aTF+w7qfoSnb1krNlzEKM0qN/xU= sha256:J13O2XfsRy6EFj7eqARFni2yFxv+YwufEt7yMeM8SoI=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <20260116170956.1c2286ca443f22c3bf3b9743@gmail.com>
Xref: csiph.com alt.os.linux.mint:46567 alt.os.linux.ubuntu:212398 alt.os.linux.mageia:28045 alt.os.linux.pclinuxos:583

pinnerite wrote:
> 1. Item A
> 2  Item B
> 
> My preference is for the numbers to be in Heebo (regular) but the Item descriptions in Heebo Black.

I looked at the face in Adobe; Black is *extremely* heavy there, where 
the series runs thin, light, regular, medium, bold, extra bold, black.

I'm wondering if black is 'too much' in such as the free version of the 
font.  Personally my 'guess' is that bold would be enough of a 
difference from regular to suit you, and more likely to be 'correct' by 
staying away from 'extremism'.

-- 
Mike Easter