Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.lang.basic > #862
| From | Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.lang.basic |
| Subject | Re: Computer guesses your number |
| Date | 2024-01-03 23:20 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <un5f71$o2v6$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <XnsB0E8EDA66DB89auricauricauricauric@135.181.20.170> <umno3r$ij1s$2@solani.org> <XnsB0EB7D2B32652auricauricauricauric@135.181.20.170> <un2hrq$o1sd$4@solani.org> <XnsB0EE913FBEF7Eauricauricauricauric@135.181.20.170> |
On 1/3/2024 3:16 PM, Auric__ wrote: > Physfitfreak wrote: > >> On 12/31/2023 1:18 PM, Auric__ wrote: >>> Compilation speed should not be something that determines your usage of >>> a language, unless we're talking "hours" (or longer); runtime speed is >>> far more important. >> >> Actually in my particular case it is the compilation speed that bothers >> me, not the execution speed. In the course of writing the codes I have >> to compile many many times to remove bugs and correct my mistakes, etc, >> while after all issues are gone, I would have to wait just once for each >> run of the executable file. There would be no hurry there. >> >> For a two line code in FreeBASIC, I have to wait 30 seconds for it to >> compile and run... This is way too slow. Imagine when I want to write a >> relatively involved program how many times and how long I have to wait >> to do the troubleshooting. > > That's... odd. What OS? What hardware? > > I'm running Windows 10 Pro 22H2 on a 10-year-old Intel i5 @ 3.2 GHz, using > the current release of FreeBASIC (1.10.1, released Xmas Eve), and this test > program: > > dim a as long > for a = 1 to 255 > print bin$(a),"" > next > > ...takes about 2-3 seconds to compile for both the 32-bit and 64-bit > versions. The same goes for the DOS version under DOSBox-X. (I don't have it > installed on other systems to check, but I imagine it would be about the > same.) So, something must be... uh... "different" about your setup. > > > As an aside, if I'm writing for a system like FreeBASIC that doesn't have a > built-in interpreter or some fast way to do test runs, I usually write in a > system that *does* -- often Qbasic or Chipmunk Basic -- and then when the > program works, I make whatever edits are needed to make it work in my chosen > system and *then* do the actual compile. > Yes, I thought so too that something was wrong with my set up but I couldn't find what. My system is old also. I am using Win10 Enterprise 64 bit on S20 ThinkStation (Xeon x5675, 20 gb RAM). I installed FreeBASIC 1.10.1-win64 and for GUI installed FBIde 0.4.6r4. Wikipedia says FreeBASIC converts the code to C++ then compiles C++. I was thinking this conversion of code is what makes it take that long. I'll try Qbasic to see how it goes.
Back to alt.lang.basic | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Computer guesses your number "F. W." <me@home.com> - 2023-03-29 15:27 +0200
Re: Computer guesses your number Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-26 19:28 -0600
Re: Computer guesses your number "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2023-12-27 23:17 +0000
Re: Computer guesses your number Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-27 18:37 -0600
Re: Computer guesses your number "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2023-12-29 06:21 +0000
Re: Computer guesses your number Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-29 18:26 -0600
Re: Computer guesses your number "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2023-12-31 19:18 +0000
Re: Computer guesses your number Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-02 20:47 -0600
Re: Computer guesses your number Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2024-01-03 15:17 +0000
Re: Computer guesses your number "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2024-01-03 21:16 +0000
Re: Computer guesses your number Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-03 23:20 -0600
Re: Computer guesses your number "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2024-01-04 22:09 +0000
Re: Computer guesses your number Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-05 20:41 -0600
Re: Computer guesses your number "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2024-01-06 19:30 +0000
Re: Computer guesses your number Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-07 16:41 -0600
Re: Computer guesses your number "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2024-01-08 03:21 +0000
Re: Computer guesses your number Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-26 19:03 -0600
Re: Computer guesses your number Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-26 23:16 -0600
Re: Computer guesses your number "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2024-01-27 05:41 +0000
Re: Computer guesses your number Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2023-12-30 21:32 +0000
Re: Computer guesses your number Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2023-12-30 20:20 -0600
Re: Computer guesses your number Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2023-12-31 08:02 +0000
Re: Computer guesses your number Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-02 20:07 -0600
Re: Computer guesses your number Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-02 20:35 -0600
Re: Computer guesses your number Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2024-01-03 15:10 +0000
Re: Computer guesses your number Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-03 23:22 -0600
csiph-web