Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | -- I LIKE SASHIMI SO HAVE SOME WASABI ON THE ARROGANCE OF INTERNATIONAL #902 - RULE OF LAW |
| Newsgroups | aus.politics, aus.legal, alt.japan.cafe, alt.japanese, soc.culture.japan |
| Date | 2018-12-27 11:54 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <e7CdnUtXSK55v7nBnZ2dnUU7-cfNnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
-- I LIKE SASHIMI SO HAVE SOME WASABI ON THE ARROGANCE OF INTERNATIONAL
#902 - RULE OF LAW
(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 27 December, 2018
BBC NEWS @ 26 DECEMBER 2018: "JAPAN WHALE HUNTING: COMMERCIAL WHALING TO
RESTART IN JULY:
Before the formal announcement was made, Nicola Beynon, head of
campaigns at Humane Society International in Australia, said Japan would
be "operating completely outside the bounds of international law".
She added: "This is the path of a pirate whaling nation, with a
troubling disregard for international rule."
Greenpeace Japan urged the government to reconsider, and warned it would
risk criticism as the host of the G20 summit in June.
Sam Annesley, Greenpeace Japan's executive director, said: "It's clear
that the government is trying to sneak in this announcement at the end
of year, away from the spotlight of international media, but the world
sees this for what it is.
"The declaration today is out of step with the international community,
let alone the protection needed to safeguard the future of our oceans
and these majestic creatures."
[<https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-46682976>]
[One, {@1: Sup: 21 (#21); Ego: 34 (#34)},
conservation, {@2: Sup: 21 (#42); Ego: 56 (#90)},
group, {@3: Sup: 62 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 41 (#131)},
warns, {@4: Sup: 44 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 12
(#143)},
that, {@5: Sup: 15 (#163); Ego: 4 (#147)},
the, {@6: Sup: 26 (#189); Ego: 51 (#198)},
move, {@7: Sup: 14 (#203); Ego: 19 (#217)},
shows, {@8: Sup: 21 (#224); Ego: 39 (#256)}
"*A* *TROUBLING* *DISREGARD* *FOR* *INTERNATIONAL* *RULE*" {@9: Sup: 1
(#225 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA); Ego: 46 (#302 - SEE KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA IDEA)},
H226@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 31 (#61); Ego: 1 (#31),
@3: Sup: 37 (#98); Ego: 6 (#37),
@4: Sup: 32 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 76 (#113 -
PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION),
Male: #130; Feme: #113
} // #437
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #407 % #41 = #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching:
H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of
the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;
THOTH MEASURE: #38 - Oh thou who makest mortals to flourish, and who
makest thine appearance at Sais; I curse not a god.
#VIRTUE: Fullness (no. #38) means the prime of life, but
#TOOLS: On the Verge (no. #78) means old age.
#POSITION: With Kinship (no. #34), attachment between even distant
relatives.
#TIME: With Severance (no. #70), offense to one’s own flesh and blood.
#CANON: #220
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_220@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 35 (#73); Ego: 78 (#116),
@3: Sup: 69 (#142); Ego: 34 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
@4: Sup: 58 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego:
70 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
Male: #200; Feme: #220
} // #220
#873 as [#1, #6, #400, #400, #10, #50, #6] / #437 as [#30, #1, #6, #400]
= 'owth (H226): {UMBRA: #0 as #407 % #41 = #38} 1) sign, signal; 2)
token, ensign, standard, miracle, proof; 1a) a distinguishing mark; 1b)
banner; 1c) #288 - *REMEMBRANCE*; 1d) miraculous sign; 1e) omen; 1f)
warning;
H226@{
[#1, {@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1)}
#6, {@2: Sup: 7 (#8); Ego: 6 (#7)}
#400, {@3: Sup: 2 (#10); Ego: 76 (#83)}
#400, {@4: Sup: 78 (#88); Ego: 76 (#159)}
#10, {@5: Sup: 7 (#95); Ego: 10 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH
MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18})}
#50, {@6: Sup: 57 (#152); Ego: 50 (#219)}
#6] {@7: Sup: 63 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF
{%34}); Ego: 6 (#225 - SEE IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA FIRST ANALOGY ON
PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE OF SUBSTANCE)}
} // #873
However, whaling remained entwined with ritual and unlike their
contemporary European counterparts the early Japanese coastal whalers
considered whales a valuable resource and did not over-exploit local stocks.
Domestically, Japanese writers have tried to call attention to
historical whale declines due to whaling practices by other nations over
hundreds of years, some of which continue today, and assert that motives
and objectives of Japanese whaling customs differ from other nations.
Supporters of the Japanese whaling tradition claim that the experience
is both humble and emotional, and all parts of a whale are used, unlike
westerners of the past who hunted only for whale oil. In addition, Japan
has strictly controlled catch quotas, and whalers have never hunted
juveniles or cow/calf pairs due to their respect for whales. When they
kill whales, hunters invoke the *BUDDHA* *AND* *PRAY* *FOR* *THE*
*REPOSE* *OF* *WHALES*' *SOULS*; *THEY* *HELD* *FUNERALS* *FOR*
*WHALES*, *BUILT* *CENOTAPHS* { #288 - *REMEMBRANCE*} for them, gave
posthumous Buddhist names to them, and when a dead fetus is removed from
a #419 - *BUTCHERED* cow, an effort is made to release it into the sea.
These practices are intended to encourage emotionally healthy or
spiritual relationships with whales, and are connected with Japanese
religious beliefs.
Even though Buddhists were opposed to hunting whales, due to the whales'
great care for their calves, enforcement of the Shorui-Awaremi-no-rei
(ordinances of animal protection) excluded whales due to being perceived
locally as fish, despite the fulfillment of terms of protection for
having "mammalian natures", and that a paper regarding whales as mammals
was published in Kyoto in 1758.
As a precept, Buddhists and other concerned people created folklore
tales about whaling communities and those who practiced whaling on an
industrial scales met tragic downfalls by *SUPERNATURAL* *PHENOMENON* {
#873 as [#1, #6, #400, #400, #10, #50, #6] / #437 as [#30, #1, #6, #400]
= 'owth (H226): {UMBRA: #0 as #407 % #41 = #38} 1) sign, signal; 2)
token, ensign, standard, miracle, proof; 1a) a distinguishing mark; 1b)
banner; 1c) #288 - *REMEMBRANCE*; 1d) miraculous sign; 1e) omen; 1f)
warning;
} such as phantoms and the curses of whales.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whaling_in_Japan>
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) FIRST ANALOGY ON PRINCIPLE OF THE
PERSISTENCE OF SUBSTANCE AS IDEAS: @B224 / @B225: "IN EVERY CHANGE OF
APPEARANCES SUBSTANCE PERSISTS, AND ITS QUANTUM IN NATURE IS NEITHER
INCREASED NOR DIMINISHED:
PROOF: All appearances are in time {ie. such as #288 - REMEMBRANCE /
MEMORIALS}, in which, as substratum (as the persisting form of inner
intuition), simultaneous existence as well as succession can alone be
represented. *THEREFORE* *TIME*, *IN* *WHICH* *EVERY* *CHANGE* *IN*
*THE* [IDEA: B225] *APPEARANCES* *IS* *TO* *BE* *THOUGHT*, *REMAINS*
*AND* *DOES* *NOT* *CHANGE*; *FOR* *IN* *IT* *ALONE* *CAN* *SUCCESSIVE*
*OR* *SIMULTANEOUS* *EXISTENCE* *BE* *REPRESENTED*, *AS* *IT'S*
*DETERMINATIONS*.
Now time in itself cannot be perceived. Consequently, in the objects of
perception, i.e., in the appearances, a substratum must be found that
represents time in general and in which all change or simultaneous
existence can be perceived through the relation of the appearances to it
in apprehension. But substance – the substratum of everything real,
i.e., of everything belonging to the existence of things – is that in
which every- thing that belongs to existence can be thought only as a
determination. Consequently, that which persists – in relation to which
alone all time-relations of the appearances can be determined – is the
substance in the appearances, i.e., the real in them, which as the
substratum of all change remains always the same. Since this therefore
cannot change in existence, its quantum in nature can also be neither
increased nor diminished." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF
PHILOSOPHY, IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783), pages 183-184]
G4587@{
[#200, {@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38)}
#5, {@2: Sup: 43 (#81); Ego: 5 (#43)}
#40, {@3: Sup: 2 (#83); Ego: 40 (#83)}
#50, {@4: Sup: 52 (#135); Ego: 50 (#133)}
#70, {@5: Sup: 41 (#176); Ego: 70 (#203)}
#300, {@6: Sup: 17 (#193); Ego: 57 (#260)}
#8, {@7: Sup: 25 (#218); Ego: 8 (#268)}
#200] {@8: Sup: 63 (#281); Ego: 38 (#306)}
} // #873
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #873 % #41 = #12 - Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining
from Desire; I-Ching: H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit;
Tetra: 25 - Contention;
THOTH MEASURE: #12 - Oh thou of the Bright Teeth, who makest thine
appearance in the Unseen Land; I am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: With Youthfulness (no. #12), to have little, but
#TOOLS: With Measure (no. #52), to have no lack.
#POSITION: With Reach (no. #15), thoughts that comprehend.
#TIME: With Exhaustion (no. #69), thoughts that confound.
#CANON: #148
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_148@{
@1: Sup: 12 (#12); Ego: 12 (#12),
@2: Sup: 64 (#76); Ego: 52 (#64),
@3: Sup: 79 (#155); Ego: 15 (#79),
@4: Sup: 67 (#222); Ego: 69 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
Male: #222; Feme: #148
} // #148
#873 as [#200, #5, #40, #50, #70, #300, #8, #200] = semnotes (G4587)
{UMBRA: #873 % #41 = #12} 1) the characteristic of a thing or person
which entitles to reverence and respect, *DIGNITY*, *MAJESTY*, sanctity;
2) honour, purity; 3) probity; gravity; honesty;
IMMANUEL KANT'S (1783) PROLEGOMENA SECTION #20 AS IDEAS: @302: "We will
therefore have to analyze experience in general, in order to see what is
contained in this product of the senses and the understanding, and how
the judgment of experience is itself possible. At bottom lies the
intuition of which I am conscious, i.e., perception (perceptio), which
belongs solely to the senses.
But, secondly, judging (which pertains solely to the understanding) also
belongs here. Now this judging can be of two types: first, when I merely
compare the perceptions and conjoin them in a consciousness of my state,
or, second, when I conjoin them in a consciousness in general. The first
judgment is merely a judgment of perception and has thus far only
subjective validity; it is merely a connection of perceptions within my
mental state, without reference to the object. Hence for experience it
is not, as is commonly imagined, sufficient to compare perceptions and
to connect them in one consciousness by means of judging; from that
there arises no universal validity and necessity of the judgment, on ac-
count of which alone it can be objectively valid and so can be experience.
A completely different judgment therefore occurs before experience can
arise from perception. The given intuition must be subsumed under a
concept that determines the form of judging in general with respect to
the intuition, connects the empirical consciousness of the latter in a
consciousness in general, and thereby furnishes empirical judgments with
universal validity; a concept of this kind is a pure a priori concept of
the understanding, which does nothing but simply determine for an
intuition the mode in general in which it can serve for judging. The
concept of cause being such a concept, it therefore determines the
intuition which is subsumed under it, e.g., that of air, with respect to
judging in general – namely, so that the concept of air serves, with
respect to expansion, in the relation of the antecedent to the
consequent in a hypothetical judgment. The concept of cause is therefore
a pure concept of the understanding, which is completely distinct from
all possible perception, and serves only, with respect to judging in
general, to determine that representation which is contained under it
and so to make possible a universally valid judgment.
Now before a judgment of experience can arise from a judgment of
perception, it is first required: that the perception be subsumed under
a concept of the understanding of this kind; e.g., the air belongs under
the concept of cause, which determines the judgment about the air as
hypothetical with respect to expansion [*of* *JAPANESE* *WHALING*].
NOTE: To have a more easily understood example, consider the following:
If the sun shines on the stone, it becomes warm. This judgment is a mere
judgment of perception and contains no necessity, however often I and
others also have perceived this; the perceptions are only usually found
so conjoined. But if I say: the sun warms the stone, then beyond the
perception is added the understanding’s concept of cause, which connects
necessarily the concept of sunshine with that of heat, and the synthetic
judgment becomes necessarily universally valid, hence objective, and
changes from a perception into experience.
This expansion is thereby represented not as belonging merely to my
perception of the air in my state of perception or in several of my
states or in the state of others, but as necessarily belonging to it,
and the judgment: the air is elastic, becomes universally valid and
thereby for the first time a judgment of experience, because certain
judgments occur beforehand, which subsume the intuition of the air under
the concept of cause and effect, and thereby determine the perceptions
not merely with respect to each other in my subject, but with respect to
the form of judging in general (here, the hypothetical), and in this way
make the empirical judgment universally valid.
HUME (died 25 August 1776, Edinburgh) had raised objections to the
notions of equality and congruence (among others) in geometry, which
objections appealed to experience (Treatise, i.ii.4.4, pp. 42–53),
thereby subjecting mathematics to experience, and whereby he also
*INCORRECTLY* rejected THE CONCEPTION THAT MATHEMATICS CONSIDERS ITS
OBJECTS INDEPENDENTLY OF THEIR EXISTENCE IN NATURE:
GNOSIS EX MACHINA {#2184}: @6 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364}; @7 -
PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION {#312}; @8 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC
SUCCESSION {#273}
Could I for instance make an #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 as either:
#6 x #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#7 x #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION
#8 x #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC SUCCESSION
} APPRAISAL of any intuited fluidity, capacity or propensity for truth
telling by deploying vEVENT categories #432 which conveys the
propositional factoid of a common ISOPSEPHIC {ie. isos meaning 'equal'
and psephos meaning 'pebble'; The Hebrew word for 'pebble' is tz'ror –
and it happens that this word also means 'bond'} association whereby the
propensity for violence increases where there is a lack of any truth
content as a depreciated integrity between persons:
#432 - VIOLENCE PROPENSITY as [#5, #80, #10, #300, #10, #9, #8, #10]
#432 - TRUTH QUOTIENT as [#40, #1, #300, #1, #10, #70, #10]
This category #432 as [#5, #80, #10, #300, #10, #9, #8, #10] =
epitithemi (G2007): {UMBRA: #10 as #472 % #41 = #21} 1) in the active
voice; 2) in the middle voice; 1a) to put or lay upon; 1b) to add to;
2a) *TO* *HAVE* *PUT* *ON*, *BID* *TO* *BE* *LAID* *ON*; 2b) *TO* *LAY*
*OR* *THROW* *ONE'S* *SELF* *UPON*; 2c) *TO* *ATTACK* *ONE*, *TO* *MAKE*
*AN* *ASSAULT* *ON* *ONE*;
G2007@{
[#5, {@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5)}
#80, {@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85)}
#10, {@3: Sup: 14 (#23); Ego: 10 (#95)}
#300, {@4: Sup: 71 (#94); Ego: 57 (#152)}
#10, {@5: Sup: 81 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}); Ego: 10
(#162)}
#9, {@6: Sup: 9 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW
{%36}); Ego: 9 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20})}
#8, {@7: Sup: 17 (#201); Ego: 8 (#179)}
#10] {@8: Sup: 27 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}); Ego:
10 (#189)}
} // #432
Tells me that a person might have loyalty and empathy with the person
whom assaulted me.
The lack of truth and waste of time is conveyed by this category #432 as
[#40, #1, #300, #1, #10, #70, #10] = mataios (G3152): {UMBRA: #11 as
#622 %#41 = #7} 1) *DEVOID* *OF* *FORCE*, *TRUTH*, *SUCCESS*, *RESULT*;
2) *USELESS*, *OF* *NO* *PURPOSE*;
G3152@{
[#40, {@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40)}
#1, {@2: Sup: 41 (#81); Ego: 1 (#41)}
#300, {@3: Sup: 17 (#98); Ego: 57 (#98)}
#1, {@4: Sup: 18 (#116); Ego: 1 (#99)}
#10, {@5: Sup: 28 (#144); Ego: 10 (#109)}
#70, {@6: Sup: 17 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 70
(#179)}
#10] {@7: Sup: 27 (#188); Ego: 10 (#189)}
} // #432
#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 =
#273 - *MOMENT*
As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
*CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
*DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the principle of #312 -
CONTRADICTION:
#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE {*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS
ON NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
#728 - REACTANCE {8 x #91 / 2 = #364 - #273 = #91} +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27
MAY 1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 -
PRIESTLY SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}
IT'S TIME FOR SOME #1 - SELF #491 - REFLECTION AND TO SHOW RESPECT
TOWARDS #492 - SAPIENT HUMANITY YOU IMBECILES.
If I have defined CHRISTIAN identity according to the summing of the
ONTIC_OBLIGANS:
#15 - [45, 68] = #113 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION {#1 - SELF #491 -
REFLECTION OF REASON AS #492 - SAPIENT FREE WILL}
#34 {PATER} - [84, 86, 102, 104, 115] = #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
#65 {SOLDIER} - [130, 139, 140, 146, 148, 150, 156, 157, 158, 161] =
#2188 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION {4 x 547 as [#80, #1, #100, #1,
#30, #70, #3, #10, #7, #70, #40, #5, #50, #70, #10] = paralogizomai
(G3884): {UMBRA: #28 as #423 % #41 = #13} 1) to reckon wrong, miscount;
2) to cheat by false reckoning; 3) to deceive, delude, circumvent; 2a)
to deceive by false reasoning}
#111 {SOL INVICTUS} - [166, 168, 169, 171, 173, 175, 177, 180, 181, 182,
184, 185, 186, 191, 192, 196, 197, 200] = #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF
MATERIALITY {3 x #1091: THAT #1092 = 3 x #364 IS THE 'OTH CYCLE OF THE
JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE}: "WHO HATH TAKEN THIS *COUNSEL* {
@1 (#1) + @2 (#41) + @3 (#81) + @4 (#369) = #10 (#492) / #12 = #41 -
ONTIC NECESSITY ESPOUSED BY 'ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL' (LIBERTÉ {17
SEPTEMBER 1900}) WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL BASIS TO EMPIRE GOVERNANCE
} AGAINST TYRE {strength; rock; sharp}, THE CROWNING CITY, WHOSE
MERCHANTS ARE PRINCES, WHOSE TRAFFICKERS ARE THE HONOURABLE OF THE
EARTH?" [Isaiah 23:8]
#175 {MARRIAGE} - [210, 215, 220, 228] = #873 - PRINCIPLE OF THE
PERSISTENCE OF SUBSTANCE / PROBITY AND DIGNITY ROYAL
Then no other definition can apply...
That #FIVE part statement {#113 / #491 / #2188 / #3273 / #873} is a
FACTUAL AND ONLY claim to JEWISH / CHRISTIAN / TAOist sapient identity
associated with this:

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/HOSPITABLITY.PNG>
As comprising #41 - ONTIC ELEMENTS {x #4 = #164 array elements} OF MORAL
IMPERATIVES / EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE (SOURCE OF ALL KNOWLEDGE) through
a TECHNOLOGY superseding QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT.
In such a CIRCUMSTANCE it is a SOVEREIGN claim which exceeds ALL OTHERS.
It cannot be argued against.
As there are issues of #873 - PROBITY BY ONTIC #205 - ABERRATION {@210 /
@215 / @220 / @228} TO PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE OF SUBSTANCE MADE
AGAINST ELIZABETH {THE OATH, FULLNESS OF GOD} REGINA II as an impunity
of the DIGNITY ROYAL in the circumstance of TREASON the ONUS of
accountability is placed upon OTHERS having no entitlement for any use
of that INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY whatsoever.
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / OUSIA.
The development of the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON is my claim to an
Intellectual Property as being compliant with a Natural Law, Common Law
and egalitarian right, in that it establishes the prima facie claim,
that my past conduct as shown by the URL accessible document below has
an integrity, and with regard to a clear and unambiguous expression of
an Autonomy of Will.
If one analyzes all of one’s synthetic judgments insofar as they are
objectively valid, one finds that they never consist in mere intuitions
that have, as is commonly thought, merely been connected in a judgment
through comparison, but rather that they would not be possible if, over
and above the concepts drawn from intuition, a pure concept of the
understanding had not been added under which these concepts had been
subsumed and in this way first connected in an objectively valid
judgment. Even the judgments of pure mathematics in its simplest axioms
are not exempt from this condition. The principle: a straight line is
the shortest line between two points, presupposes that the line has been
subsumed under the concept of magnitude, which certainly is no mere
intuition, but has its seat solely in the understanding and serves to
determine the intuition (of the line) with respect to such judgments as
may be passed on it as regards the quantity of these judgments, namely
plurality (as *JUDICIA* *PLURATIVA*), [IDEA: @302] since through such
judgments it is understood that in a given intuition a #391 -
*HOMOGENEOUS* plurality is contained [rather than the pretentious
arrogance of binomial (LATIN) jurisprudence].
NOTE: So I would prefer those judgments to be called, which are called
particularia in logic. For the latter expression already contains the
thought that they are not universal. If, however, I commence from unity
(in singular judgments) and then continue on to the totality, I still
cannot mix in any reference to the totality; I think only a plurality
without totality, not the exception to the latter. This is necessary, if
the logical moments are to be placed under the pure concepts of the
understanding; in logical usage things can remain as they were."
[CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, IMMANUEL KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA (1783), pages 52-54]
Thus to make any lawful claim of breaches as lack of #873 - PROBITY BY
ONTIC #205 - ABERRATION {@210 / @215 / @220 / @228} TO *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* then the following sapient /
temporal @205 - appraisals (HOMOGENEOUS NATURE / OTHER TRANSFORMATIVE
PROTOTYPES MAY BE DEPLOYED) must be demonstrated as #331 - NOT being
complied with:
<http://www.grapple369.com/?telos:205>
<http://www.grapple369.com/?telos:210>
<http://www.grapple369.com/?telos:215>
<http://www.grapple369.com/?telos:220>
<http://www.grapple369.com/?telos:228>
FOR INSTANCE #225 IS ASSOCIATED TO THE #41 - *ONTIC* NECESSITY #287 -
*BOND* *OF* *NATURE* MORAL PRESCRIPTION {#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature:
#15 - Form of Nature [#287 - COVET NOT])} WITHIN THIS
Nous: #65
Time: 04:05 hrs
Date: 2018.5.22
Torah: [#8, #70, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 78 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 70 (#78),
@3: Sup: 37 (#123); Ego: 40 (#118),
Male: #123; Feme: #118
} // #118
Dao: Unlearned Virtuosity as Simplicity
Tetra: #63 - Watch
I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up
Latin: Sublevator {God, the hope of all the children of the earth} Alt:
Mabhel {Emptiness of Things Before God} {
1. PROTECTS AGAINST LIGHTNING & INFERNAL SPIRITS OF RELIGIOUS CULTS
2. CREED
3. INFLUENCES & PROTECTS THOSE WHO SEEK THE TRUTH
4. Serucuth
}
Jehoshaphat {The Lord is judge}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#287 - *BONDS* *OF* *NATURE* *AND* *WHAT* *OUGHT*
*ACCORDING* *TO* *THE* *LAW* *OF* *DUTY* / #465} / HETEROS {#299 / #390
- *SOVEREIGNTY*} / TORAH {#300 / #431}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:2,col:7,nous:65&idea:{m,88}&idea:{f,117}&idea:{m,287}&idea:{f,465}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
.jackNote@zen: 2, row: 2, col: 7, nous: 65 [Date: 2018.5.22, Time: 04:05
hrs, Super: #287 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation;
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #465 / #65 -
Unlearned Virtuosity as Simplicity; I-Ching: H20 - Viewing,
Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 63 - Watch]
QUEEN SPEAKS PUBLICLY ON BREXIT FOR FIRST TIME DURING DUTCH ROYAL VISIT:
During a state banquet for the King of the Netherlands and his wife
Queen Maxima, QUEEN ELIZABETH II said that "AS WE LOOK TOWARD A NEW
PARTNERSHIP WITH EUROPE", the values shared by the UK and Holland "ARE
OUR GREATEST ASSETS".
In front of a watching Theresa May at Buckingham Palace, the Queen added
that as "INNOVATORS, TRADERS AND INTERNATIONALISTS WE LOOK WITH
CONFIDENCE TO THE FUTURE".
The Queen, who is impartial in political matters, chose to emphasise the
qualities needed by the UK and one of its closet European neighbours
going forward - as UK politicians continue to be bitterly divided by BREXIT.
Earlier, in a speech to both Houses of Parliament, King Willem-Alexander
urged the government to lift the "SHADOW OF UNCERTAINTY" hanging over
Dutch nationals living in Britain after BREXIT.
And in his address at the Palace dinner, with Ms May seated nearby, the
foreign head of state continued: "AT PRESENT, A LOT OF ATTENTION IS
FOCUSED ON THE 'TECHNICAL' SIDE OF BREXIT. THAT'S UNDERSTANDABLE AND
NECESSARY.
BUT IN THE MIDST OF ALL THAT COMPLEXITY WE SHOULD NOT LOSE SIGHT OF THE
GREATER NARRATIVE THAT CONTINUES TO BIND {#41 x 7 = #287 as [#1, #50,
#1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200] = anagkaios (G316): {UMBRA: #9 as #356 %
#41 = #28} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without, indispensable;
1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what ought according
to the law of duty be done, what is required by the circumstances} US.
THE GREATER NARRATIVE OF FREEDOM, OPENNESS AND COOPERATION. OF GROWTH
AND A PROSPERITY WHOSE FRUITS ARE ENJOYED BY ALL." [JAMES MORRIS /
OLIVIA TOBIN (EVENING STANDARD NEWS) @ 2221 HOURS (UTC) ON 23 OCTOBER 2018]
THAT Nicola Beynon, head of campaigns at Humane Society International in
Australia *IS* *A* *HYPOCRITE* *WHOM* shows a lack of #873 - PROBITY BY
ONTIC #205 - ABERRATION {@210 / @215 / @220 / @228} TO PRINCIPLE OF THE
PERSISTENCE OF SUBSTANCE MADE AGAINST ELIZABETH {THE OATH, FULLNESS OF
GOD} REGINA II as an impunity of the DIGNITY ROYAL AND in the
circumstance of TREASON the ONUS of accountability is placed upon OTHERS
having no entitlement for any use of that INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY whatsoever.
THAT BECAUSE OF IMMORAL AND HAUGHTY PEOPLE {ie. *INHUMANE* *and*
*UNCIVIL* *SOCIETY*} SUCH AS NICOLA BEYNON WE CANNOT GET JUSTICE WITHIN
AUSTRALIA AND THERE IS NO MORE REDEMPTION AVAILABLE FOR YOU.
- dolf
Initial Post: 27 December 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Back to alt.japan.cafe | Previous | Next | Find similar
-- I LIKE SASHIMI SO HAVE SOME WASABI ON THE ARROGANCE OF INTERNATIONAL #902 - RULE OF LAW dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2018-12-27 11:54 +1100
csiph-web