Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN
Date: 30 Sep 2024 07:40:58 GMT
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <llv30aFa6uvU3@mid.individual.net>
References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks> <5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vcub5c$36h63$1@dont-email.me> <36KdnVlGJu9VLW77nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <971448126.749088380.092448.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <vd5195$edas$1@dont-email.me> <59CJO.19674$MoU3.15170@fx36.iad> <vd6vto$r0so$1@dont-email.me> <iJEJO.198176$kxD8.81657@fx11.iad> <3hOdnWpQ649QMGr7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vd8doi$15q07$1@dont-email.me> <vd8eg7$15v1j$2@dont-email.me> <cxicnVzg_cn_eGX7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vdapbn$1kp35$5@dont-email.me> <lltpunF4fseU2@mid.individual.net> <1smdnSjX3YoxgWf7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net mw5UkcGLZGcgyYhl0TROaAbQ490fH1lZI2WOlEtWUCN/enWOft
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fAJcz7Xz1g5p6ETAWllMZt+FfeA= sha256:b3wSc2qum6kueUZRVGaYmEvmYXxyNWDxz5itGBTwZ3U=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Xref: csiph.com alt.folklore.computers:227249 comp.os.linux.misc:58718

On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 23:36:11 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

>    There's always a psychology in the computer world that immediately
>    embraces the "Newest/Greatest Thing"
>    whether it's actually good/improved or not. Shit, I remember when 'C'
>    was in that category ... that one DID hang on

That's something that's puzzled me all of my life and on a wider scale 
than computer languages. Why does Religion X survive while Religion Y, 
which is equally as plausible/implausible become an also ran? Why does C 
hand on while C++ never quite lived up to its promises? Why is Pike 
completely off the map? It isn't that bad of a C-like language?

Some things live the AC vs. DC wars have valid technological answers. 
Others like the i86 architecture seem more like accidents at a point in 
time.