Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: David Hume Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: rationality Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 21:42:36 +0100 Organization: Haphazard Lines: 16 Message-ID: <84vbai9zr7.fsf@example.com> References: <3a2l0btnhg7crbcbjbb9biidpndu6arb9m@4ax.com> <37cf9cf9-a75d-4166-8c3b-f02f3ab3a7a8@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 3UugYRo19USy8ZAw0/fY5A.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-No-Archive: Yes X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:SIpjFnXYEh73Fu5v89yShSMesxk= Xref: csiph.com alt.folklore.computers:152417 Stephen Sprunk writes: >> Is laziness irrational? > > IMHO, no. Laziness (and selfishness) is completely rational. > I think I saw in a wildlife programme that for sloths, laziness was an adaptation. They move slowly to conserve energy and that allows them to live on leaves. Historically though humans would have shared work and resources for mutual benefit. So you could argue either way on that. And just so I am not completely off topic, free software is a modern example.