Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > alt.engineering.electrical > #18184
| From | mulano <pharma-poison@lynkuet.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.engineering.electrical, sac.politics |
| Subject | Re: Americans Ready For Green New Deal |
| Date | 2026-02-15 11:43 +0300 |
| Organization | Victor Usenet Postings |
| Message-ID | <ea54dee36c29130e9564da@radio-eriwan.ru> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <ougrokti512l5ddmhj5ht625c7oov23mbj@4ax.com> <10ml9od$1ndlt$1@dont-email.me> <5u4uok5l0liup6lvocfcts161rcpa9thmt@4ax.com> <10mn9rr$2bs1u$1@dont-email.me> <2a11pkdrcm7eor1kf0ia076n0vq2036p6o@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 14 Feb 2026, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> posted some news:2a11pkdrcm7eor1kf0ia076n0vq2036p6o@4ax.com: > On Fri, 13 Feb 2026 08:44:27 -0500, -hh ><recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > >>On 2/13/26 07:07, NoBody wrote: >>> On Thu, 12 Feb 2026 14:30:21 -0500, -hh >>> <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2/12/26 07:14, NoBody wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 11 Feb 2026 11:33:51 -0500, -hh >>>>> <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2/11/26 07:19, NoBody wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:51:20 -0500, -hh >>>>>>> <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2/10/26 17:09, Socialism is for losers wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 15:37:43 -0500, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2/10/26 15:20, Socialism is for losers wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:37:46 -0500, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>>> His cite was that in 2024, renewables were less than 50%. >>>>>>>>>>>> My cite was that in 2025, renewables were now more than >>>>>>>>>>>> 50%. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Socialism can't bring himself to admit that newer data >>>>>>>>>>>> supersedes his older data. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've seen no fuel mix data for Western Australia for 2025 >>>>>>>>>>> that says renewable and solar are the primary source. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Correct, because what I cited reported just that renewables >>>>>>>>>> were 52%, not the entire breakdown. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <LOL> I've seen no fuel mix data for Western Australia for >>>>>>>>> 2025 that says renewables are 52% of the sources for electric >>>>>>>>> generation.... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Translation: >>>>>>>> "Not seen" because they chose to not read the citations. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -hh >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your own cite: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "The NEM does not include Western Australia or the Northern >>>>>>> Territory. Western Australia also recorded higher renewable use >>>>>>> and declines in fossil fuel use, even as the state extended the >>>>>>> life of a coal plant over longer-term energy security worries. >>>>>>> Origin Energy (ORG.AX), opens new tab announced an extension of >>>>>>> a coal plant the same week." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Well? >>>>>> >>>>>> I never claimed that Australia as a whole was majority renewable, >>>>>> so all you're doing is trying to move the goalposts to be >>>>>> continent-wide. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> LAUGHTER! >>>>> >>>>> You most certainly implied that. >>>> >>>> Original statement: >>>> >>>> "Oh, so hitting 52% on the Western Australia grid was impossible?" >>>> >>>> Showing that from the start, it was clearly not continent-wide. >>>> >>>> And further reinforced with: >>>> >>>> "I mentioned Western Australia, the world's largest isolated grid. >>>> Because in 2025, their electricity generation from renewables >>>> exceeded the 50% mark. >>>> >>>> Need a cite? Here ya go: >>>> <https://www.instagram.com/p/DRvnOGoCPi2/" >>>> >>>> Keep losing! >>>> >>>>>> The problem you have with that strategy is that on a >>>>>> continent-wide basis, Australia is currently within roughly 1% of >>>>>> being 50/50 renewables and fossil fuels. >>>>> >>>>> Except that it's not through ALL of Australia. >>>>> >>>>> LAUGHTER! >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The ramifications are that if their double-digit growth in >>>>>> renewables deployment continues through 2026 as planned, the >>>>>> entire continent's electrical grid will be majority renewables >>>>>> within the next few months. >>>>>> >>>>>> Care to bet against that? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Get your numbers in order and accurate so the discussion can >>>>> continue. >>>> >>>> >>>> And that's a "no" from Nobody. Coward in real life, as usual. >>>> >>> >>> Your numbers for the nation are where again? Instead of getting >>> them, you doubled down on stupid. >> >> >>Here's the cite again: >> >><https://explore.openelectricity.org.au/energy/au/?range=30d&interval=1 >>d&view=discrete-time&group=Renewables%2FFossils> >> >>Today's rolling 30 day average is 50.7% FF's / 49.3% renewables, which >>is once again within 1% of 50/50 parity. >> >>So as noted above: >> >>"The ramifications are that if their double-digit growth in renewables >>deployment continues through 2026 as planned, the entire continent's >>electrical grid will be majority renewables within the next few >>months. >> >>Care to bet against that?" >> > > So where does it say that it covers all of Australia? ‘Catastrophic failure’ of transformer at Waratah Super Battery, Australia’s ‘giant shock-absorber’ for the grid https://www.energy-storage.news/catastrophic-failure-of-transformer-at- waratah-super-battery-australias-giant-shock-absorber-for-the-grid/ Oops. >> >>-hh >
Back to alt.engineering.electrical | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Americans Ready For Green New Deal mulano <pharma-poison@lynkuet.com> - 2026-02-15 11:43 +0300
csiph-web