Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.consumers.free-stuff > #38
| From | <noreply@none.net> |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20251029.094437.89b6e67d@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <20251026.174504.b9da8476@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <20251026.153302.0b7d649a@dirge.harmsk.com> <c7480fed24cb73424033cbb6b30870f0@dizum.com> <20251027.170241.089fdc17@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <bafb8c617d8a35c6c48925369da30867@dizum.com> |
| Date | 2025-10-29 09:44 +0100 |
| Newsgroups | alt.consumers.free-stuff, alt.consumers.uk-freebies, alt.free.newsservers.kadaitcha-man, alt.privacy.anon-server |
| Subject | Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit. |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 27 Oct 2025, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> posted some news:bafb8c617d8a35c6c48925369da30867@dizum.com: > On 27 Oct 2025, Fritz Wuehler ><fritz@spamexpire-202510.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> posted some > news:20251027.170241.089fdc17@msgid.frell.theremailer.net: > >> Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote: >>>On 26 Oct 2025, D <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> posted some >>>news:20251026.153302.0b7d649a@dirge.harmsk.com: >>> >>>> On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 17:45:04 +0100, Fritz Wuehler >>>> <fritz@spamexpire-202510.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote: >>>>>Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote: >>>>>>On 25 Oct 2025, Radio Eriwan <bounce.me@radio-eriwan.ru> posted >>>>>>some news:1761435073483161656.ac@radio-eriwan.ru: >>>> snip >> >> Reinserted from MID <1761435073483161656.ac@radio-eriwan.ru>: >> >>>>>>> Ah, ok. So pseudonymous remailing with Mixmaster and YAMN, in >>>>>>> your eyes, is secure 'anonymous' remailing. Mind you, you must >>>>>>> use Tor or you would shit in your pants without it. So much for >>>>>>> TypeII 'anonymous' remailing. >> >>>>> >>>>>Remailers don't need Tor at all. Tor was developed long after the >>>>>invention of anonymous remailing in order to have something similar >>>>>for from the anonymity perspective inherently problematic real-time >>>>>(web) communication. >>>>>You send some packets to the entry remailer and nobody can figure >>>>>out which mail message at some exit remailer they represent, if any, >>>>>as you just may have sent dummy packets. That isn't pseudonymity, >>>>>it's true anonymity no matter what shithead Claas tells you. >>> >>>He never said it wasn't. >> >> Just one more of your lies, Claas. Or what else does your Radio Claas >> statement reinserted above mean? >> >> Btw, Claas, what do you try to achieve with that insane Newsgroups >> list? >> >>| alt.culture.internet, alt.folklore.internet, alt.internet, >>| alt.internet.guru, alt.privacy.anon-server >> >> Confirm your reputation as the nastiest crook in town? > > … I am the Grinch > Hey, how you doing, you scum is a pleasure to meet you > (Show me some love) > I am the Grinch > I'm here to ruin your day to swoop in and defeat > (Show me some love) > I am the Grinch > I get to ridin' and ridin' and ridin' around > (Show me some love) > I am the Grinch > That's what they call me when they talk about me around the town > … That's me! Very good. +1
Back to alt.consumers.free-stuff | Previous — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit. Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2025-10-27 22:10 +0100 Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit. <noreply@none.net> - 2025-10-29 09:44 +0100
csiph-web