Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > alt.consumers.free-stuff > #38

Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit.

From <noreply@none.net>
Message-ID <20251029.094437.89b6e67d@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <20251026.174504.b9da8476@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <20251026.153302.0b7d649a@dirge.harmsk.com> <c7480fed24cb73424033cbb6b30870f0@dizum.com> <20251027.170241.089fdc17@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> <bafb8c617d8a35c6c48925369da30867@dizum.com>
Date 2025-10-29 09:44 +0100
Newsgroups alt.consumers.free-stuff, alt.consumers.uk-freebies, alt.free.newsservers.kadaitcha-man, alt.privacy.anon-server
Subject Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit.

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 27 Oct 2025, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> posted some news:bafb8c617d8a35c6c48925369da30867@dizum.com:

> On 27 Oct 2025, Fritz Wuehler
><fritz@spamexpire-202510.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> posted some
> news:20251027.170241.089fdc17@msgid.frell.theremailer.net: 
> 
>> Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>>On 26 Oct 2025, D <noreply@dirge.harmsk.com> posted some
>>>news:20251026.153302.0b7d649a@dirge.harmsk.com: 
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 17:45:04 +0100, Fritz Wuehler
>>>> <fritz@spamexpire-202510.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote: 
>>>>>Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>>>>>>On 25 Oct 2025, Radio Eriwan <bounce.me@radio-eriwan.ru> posted
>>>>>>some news:1761435073483161656.ac@radio-eriwan.ru: 
>>>> snip
>> 
>> Reinserted from MID <1761435073483161656.ac@radio-eriwan.ru>:
>> 
>>>>>>> Ah, ok. So pseudonymous remailing with Mixmaster and YAMN, in
>>>>>>> your eyes, is secure 'anonymous' remailing. Mind you, you must
>>>>>>> use Tor or you would shit in your pants without it. So much for
>>>>>>> TypeII 'anonymous' remailing. 
>> 
>>>>>
>>>>>Remailers don't need Tor at all.  Tor was developed long after the
>>>>>invention of anonymous remailing in order to have something similar
>>>>>for from the anonymity perspective inherently problematic real-time
>>>>>(web) communication.
>>>>>You send some packets to the entry remailer and nobody can figure
>>>>>out which mail message at some exit remailer they represent, if any,
>>>>>as you just may have sent dummy packets. That isn't pseudonymity,
>>>>>it's true anonymity no matter what shithead Claas tells you.
>>>
>>>He never said it wasn't.
>> 
>> Just one more of your lies, Claas.  Or what else does your Radio Claas
>> statement reinserted above mean?
>> 
>> Btw, Claas, what do you try to achieve with that insane Newsgroups
>> list? 
>> 
>>| alt.culture.internet, alt.folklore.internet, alt.internet,
>>| alt.internet.guru, alt.privacy.anon-server
>> 
>> Confirm your reputation as the nastiest crook in town?
> 
> … I am the Grinch
> Hey, how you doing, you scum is a pleasure to meet you
> (Show me some love)
> I am the Grinch
> I'm here to ruin your day to swoop in and defeat
> (Show me some love)
> I am the Grinch
> I get to ridin' and ridin' and ridin' around
> (Show me some love)
> I am the Grinch
> That's what they call me when they talk about me around the town
> … That's me!

Very good.  +1

Back to alt.consumers.free-stuff | PreviousPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit. Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2025-10-27 22:10 +0100
  Re: [Spam] neodome [Spam] back [Spam] to [Spam] the [Spam] same [Spam] shit.  <noreply@none.net> - 2025-10-29 09:44 +0100

csiph-web