Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.comp.lang.javascript > #110
| From | denodster@gmail.com (Denodster) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Is AJAX a heavy framework? |
| Date | 2023-12-17 20:30 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <denodster-1712232030050001@192.168.1.200> (permalink) |
| References | <4531fb49$0$144$157c6196@dreader2.cybercity.dk> <950cbe2e-732a-424a-bbc4-6c89a7a1b5b7n@googlegroups.com> |
In article <950cbe2e-732a-424a-bbc4-6c89a7a1b5b7n@googlegroups.com>, Angel
<he12091983@gmail.com> wrote:
> What do you mean by that ?
>
> The way I see it, it is not heavy at all.
>
> If You use Jquery library ajax, then this will be slower, because Jquery is=
> about 50KB.
>
>
> *******************************
> Angel
>
>
> Mike kirjutas P=C3=BChap=C3=A4ev, 15. oktoober 2006 kl 11:11:41 UTC+2:
> > Hi
> > I've read about AJAX and is fairly impressed by what it can do for me, an=
> d=20
> > I'm considering using it. However i've heard that using the AJAX framewor=
> k=20
> > slows the loadtime of the site because the framework is rather heavy. Is=
> =20
> > there any thuth to this?
> > Thanx
> > Mike
Most browsers support fetch() these days.
/******/
fetch("http://example.com").then((response) => {
return response.json()
}).then((jsonObject) => {
//do things with jsonObject
}
/******/
Back to alt.comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: Is AJAX a heavy framework? Angel <he12091983@gmail.com> - 2022-06-29 06:01 -0700 Re: Is AJAX a heavy framework? denodster@gmail.com (Denodster) - 2023-12-17 20:30 -0500
csiph-web