Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.comp.issues.privacy > #53
| From | Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> |
|---|---|
| References | <9bc955924161a0ad33683621f564c60c@dizum.com> |
| Subject | Re: If you watched certain YouTube videos, investigators demanded your data from Google |
| Message-ID | <cfc3e5635a478f75b55c970a52a544a8@dizum.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2024-03-24 11:02 +0100 |
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.issues.privacy, alt.government.abuse, alt.privacy, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.internet.services.google |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On 23 Mar 2024, Thank A Democrat <invalid@none.360> posted some news:9bc955924161a0ad33683621f564c60c@dizum.com: > If you've ever jokingly wondered if your search or viewing history is > going to "put you on some kind of list," your concern may be more than > warranted. > > In now unsealed court documents reviewed by Forbes, Google was ordered > to hand over the names, addresses, telephone numbers, and user > activity of Youtube accounts and IP addresses that watched select > YouTube videos, part of a larger criminal investigation by federal > investigators. > > The videos were sent by undercover police to a suspected > cryptocurrency launderer under the username "elonmuskwhm." In > conversations with the bitcoin trader, investigators sent links to > public YouTube tutorials on mapping via drones and augmented reality > software, Forbes details. The videos were watched more than 30,000 > times, presumably by thousands of users unrelated to the case. Hell, I probably watched the drone stuff. > YouTube's parent company Google was ordered by federal investigators > to quietly hand over all such viewer data for the period of Jan. 1 to > Jan. 8, 2023, but Forbes couldn't confirm if Google had complied. > > The mandated data retrieval is worrisome in itself, according to > privacy experts. Federal investigators argued the request was legally > justified as the data "would be relevant and material to an ongoing > criminal investigation, including by providing identification > information about the perpetrators," citing justification used by > other police forces around the country. In a case out of New > Hampshire, police requested similar data during the investigation of > bomb threats that were being streamed live to YouTube — the order > specifically requested viewership information at select time stamps > during the live streams. They were fishing. > "With all law enforcement demands, we have a rigorous process designed > to protect the privacy and constitutional rights of our users while > supporting the important work of law enforcement," Google spokesperson > Matt Bryant told Forbes. "We examine each demand for legal validity, > consistent with developing case law, and we routinely push back > against over broad or otherwise inappropriate demands for user data, > including objecting to some demands entirely." > > Privacy experts, however, are worried about the kind of precedent the > court's order creates, citing concerns over the protections of the > first and fourth amendments. "This is the latest chapter in a > disturbing trend where we see government agencies increasingly > transforming search warrants into digital dragnets," executive > director of the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project Albert > Fox-Cahn told the publication. "It’s unconstitutional, it’s > terrifying, and it’s happening every day." The Biden administration cares naught for the law. They've demonstrated that repeatedly. > Advocates have called on Google to be more transparent about its data- > sharing policies for years, with fears stoked by ongoing open arrests > of protestors and the creeping state-wide criminalization of abortion. > > In December, Google updated its privacy policies to allow users to > save their location data directly to their devices rather than the > cloud, and shortened the retention time for such storage — the new > policies also indirectly stunted the long-used investigatory > workaround in which law enforcement officials use Google location data > to target suspects. Don't be logged into google accounts when browsing and always turn off your location. > Google has been taken to court over such concerns over the past year, > including two state supreme court cases surrounding the > constitutionality of keyword search warrants, which force sites to > turn over an individual's internet search data. > > https://mashable.com/article/google-ordered-to-hand-over-viewer-data- > privacy-concerns
Back to alt.comp.issues.privacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
If you watched certain YouTube videos, investigators demanded your data from Google Thank A Democrat <invalid@none.360> - 2024-03-24 00:25 +0100 Re: If you watched certain YouTube videos, investigators demanded your data from Google Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2024-03-24 11:02 +0100
csiph-web