Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #82464 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-03-20 09:15 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-03-20 19:39 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 510 — 35 participants |
Back to article view | Back to alt.checkmate
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 09:15 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Bill (not Jillians) Royal Order of the DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2017-03-20 12:23 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-20 16:23 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Peter KΓΆhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-20 17:28 +0100
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 09:38 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Peter KΓΆhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-20 17:43 +0100
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 09:35 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-20 12:01 -0500
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> - 2017-03-20 18:31 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-20 19:57 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-20 18:17 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-20 22:37 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-20 18:54 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-20 23:13 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-20 19:36 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 01:10 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 15:09 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 19:21 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 00:54 +0100
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-22 02:11 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-21 19:22 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 03:12 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-22 15:28 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 18:50 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 18:49 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 09:29 -0500
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-20 17:25 -0600
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-20 19:43 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-20 20:02 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 01:12 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 18:56 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-20 22:18 -0600
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-21 16:55 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 12:17 -0500
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 12:04 -0600
Kaczynski found his communist wonderland, prison. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-20 17:54 -0700
Re: Kaczynski found his communist wonderland, prison. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 09:14 -0500
Re: Kaczynski found his communist wonderland, prison. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 15:14 -0400
Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-21 12:20 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 15:35 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-21 13:07 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 16:16 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-21 13:22 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 16:42 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 20:57 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:21 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:19 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-22 15:07 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-22 14:11 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-22 16:07 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 01:27 +0100
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:17 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 20:26 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 16:46 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 16:00 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:23 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-21 16:25 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 20:02 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-21 16:32 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:42 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-22 15:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:22 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-21 16:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 16:51 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 15:58 -0500
Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-21 13:59 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 16:02 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:30 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 23:38 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:47 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-22 02:15 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-21 19:25 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-22 00:30 -0600
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-22 01:45 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-22 00:06 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Emmett BADASS Gulley <emmettgulley71@qmail.com> - 2017-03-22 15:12 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Rick Mathers <halfdick@invalid.invalid> - 2017-03-22 15:19 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? AlbΓ€tross <mΓ€il.tΓΆ.Γ€lbΓ€tross@gmΓ€il.cΓΆm> - 2017-03-26 18:44 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:05 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? AlbΓ€tross <mΓ€il.tΓΆ.Γ€lbΓ€tross@gmΓ€il.cΓΆm> - 2017-03-26 20:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:42 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 21:02 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 16:39 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:30 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-24 05:48 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-21 18:40 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Anglo Saxon <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-03-22 05:43 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-22 00:51 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-22 15:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-22 12:34 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-22 17:15 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-22 16:17 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-23 07:14 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 08:42 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-23 07:59 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 09:23 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-23 08:37 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-23 14:18 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-23 14:28 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 16:35 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-24 06:44 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 09:03 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 13:08 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 12:43 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:04 -0700
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:10 -0500
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:17 -0700
Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:25 -0500
Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β β Snowflake β Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:39 -0700
Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:42 -0500
Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right β Snowflake β Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:44 -0700
Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not e β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:46 -0500
Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not e β Snowflake β Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 15:00 -0700
Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 17:04 -0500
Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β β Snowflake β Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 15:06 -0700
Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β β Snowflake β Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 21:00 -0400
Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 22:49 -0500
Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β β Snowflake β Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 05:51 +0100
Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-24 10:42 -0500
Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly β Snowflake β Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 01:52 +0100
Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-24 12:49 -0500
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:24 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:46 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 16:27 -0700
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 18:30 -0500
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 17:40 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-24 14:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-24 13:49 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 01:31 +0100
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-24 17:59 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-24 18:05 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-24 18:35 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-24 18:56 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 12:19 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 12:19 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-23 18:08 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 14:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-23 19:28 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 16:38 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 16:22 +0000
He thought, " Parliament made my wife too free and independent ". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-25 11:42 -0700
Re: He thought, " Parliament made my wife too free and independent ". Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 18:10 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-25 14:14 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-25 19:52 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 18:02 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-25 22:03 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 22:14 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:15 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 15:32 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 23:07 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-03-26 00:01 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 21:00 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Ms Kitty, DoW #6" <Ms.Kitty@dow.six> - 2017-03-26 00:03 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-26 13:04 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-27 04:09 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-03-26 17:55 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 15:32 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 02:56 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 04:34 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:42 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:39 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:52 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:35 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:35 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-27 14:40 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:52 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:11 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 21:33 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:47 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:22 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 19:48 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 20:23 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 21:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:26 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:25 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:26 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:34 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:15 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:25 -0700
No doubt about it now vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 20:44 +0000
Re: No doubt about it now Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:25 -0400
Re: No doubt about it now Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:41 +0000
Re: No doubt about it now Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:20 +0800
Re: No doubt about it now Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:29 +0000
Re: No doubt about it now Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:41 +0800
Re: No doubt about it now Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 19:47 -0400
Re: No doubt about it now Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:22 -0700
Re: No doubt about it now chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-28 06:59 -0500
Re: No doubt about it now Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:58 -0400
Re: No doubt about it now Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 14:10 -0700
Re: No doubt about it now Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:27 -0700
Re: No doubt about it now vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 22:11 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:25 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:08 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Ms Kitty, DoW #6" <Ms.Kitty@dow.six> - 2017-03-27 23:00 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:45 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-28 07:55 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 14:11 -0700
String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 21:39 -0700
String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 21:48 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:56 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:57 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:08 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-26 20:41 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-26 21:19 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 14:23 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-26 21:38 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:24 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:33 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 09:52 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-25 23:30 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-27 04:13 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 15:13 -0700
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-25 17:16 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:13 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:22 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:29 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:34 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:41 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:58 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:08 -0400
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-26 08:33 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:09 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 21:00 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 22:17 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 15:36 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:16 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 15:32 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 18:41 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 22:54 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 19:10 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 16:51 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:26 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-27 15:06 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 10:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-27 18:41 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 11:54 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-25 23:32 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:01 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 00:02 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:17 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:20 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-26 00:45 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:59 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:43 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:18 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:25 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:40 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:57 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-25 20:07 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:19 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:24 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:44 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 22:25 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:33 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:17 +0000
Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 18:00 -0700
Re: Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:05 -0400
Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 18:17 -0700
Re: Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:33 -0400
Now I see the light, it's raining cats and dogs. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 19:53 -0700
Re: Now I see the light, it's raining cats and dogs. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 23:02 -0400
Re: Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 21:10 -0400
Hippie Jesus. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-25 19:01 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:49 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:10 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:10 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 22:31 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:41 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:39 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:22 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:45 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:00 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:22 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 23:49 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:10 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:44 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:48 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:05 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:07 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:07 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:23 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:30 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:42 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:32 -0700
NOMINATION Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:32 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:26 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:25 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:12 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:34 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:27 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Kachina Dancer <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-25 23:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 23:52 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:43 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:01 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:52 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 15:58 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 16:04 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 16:46 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 18:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:28 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-26 22:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 08:22 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Peter KΓΆhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-26 03:36 +0200
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:47 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:02 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:12 -0400
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-26 08:35 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:04 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:53 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:56 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:07 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-26 23:17 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:02 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 20:44 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:56 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 21:10 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:44 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 01:54 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:04 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:04 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
Kids today make Jesus look like Trump. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 20:21 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 08:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 10:36 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:08 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom, WoD #1) - 2017-03-27 10:07 +0100
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-27 02:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:38 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:47 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:55 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 23:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:23 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 20:43 -0700
Both Michael Glasser and CaptainPissBucket have OCD, bad. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 20:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:22 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 16:00 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:21 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:42 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:17 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Peter KΓΆhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-28 00:31 +0200
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:31 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-27 15:35 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 19:50 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:54 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 14:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:24 -0700
Men were _not created equally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 20:51 -0700
Re: Men were _not created equally. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:44 -0400
Re: Men were _not created equally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 14:12 -0700
Re: Men were _not created equally. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-28 22:14 -0500
Re: Men were _not created equally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 20:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:07 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 20:39 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:53 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:05 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 21:15 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:30 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 19:42 -0700
Trump is more "golden calf" than Christian. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 21:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 13:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-28 01:56 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 03:49 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:59 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 06:17 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 14:52 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:34 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 19:39 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:48 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 20:38 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:58 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 21:21 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:46 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 16:55 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:35 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:01 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-27 16:16 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:49 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:20 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:22 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:50 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2017-03-29 10:10 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 01:11 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 01:13 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:25 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 01:56 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.orq> - 2017-03-26 22:26 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:28 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@qmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:32 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:26 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 02:48 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:53 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-27 07:22 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:37 -0700
Do you invite murders and rapists to your parties ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-23 12:09 -0700
Re: Do you invite murders and rapists to your parties ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 12:13 -0700
Re: Do you invite murders and rapists to your parties ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-23 19:20 +0000
Yesterday's religion is today's politics, and I'm agnostic. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-23 13:40 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> - 2017-03-23 18:09 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 14:20 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 12:23 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> - 2017-03-23 19:08 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 16:33 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:01 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:10 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:12 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:24 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:26 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:54 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 21:04 -0400
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 22:57 -0500
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 23:02 -0500
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:31 -0500
Re:Snowflake Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:49 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:53 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:18 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:29 -0400
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:32 -0500
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-23 21:34 +0000
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:40 -0500
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:42 -0700
Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β β Snowflake β Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:44 -0500
Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 04:02 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ? Snowflake ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:24 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-23 21:30 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:55 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:22 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 18:02 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 18:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 18:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-24 02:05 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 21:12 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 18:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-24 08:24 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-24 17:55 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 10:43 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:14 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:20 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:52 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:50 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2017-03-23 19:44 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:51 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2017-03-24 10:04 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 08:52 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-24 17:57 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-24 02:05 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2017-03-24 10:08 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 12:20 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 15:57 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:51 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-24 00:19 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:36 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-22 16:09 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-22 18:49 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 08:59 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-23 12:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-23 14:21 -0400
NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 01:04 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 18:58 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 15:17 -0400
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 19:25 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Bill (not Jillians) Royal Order of the DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2017-03-21 17:26 -0400
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 16:30 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-21 15:59 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 16:59 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-21 16:03 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:11 -0600
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-20 17:14 -0600
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-20 19:39 -0400
Page 6 of 26 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 26 Next page →
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 06:44 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <151adctkjpt7j9mcupo1mu7qjn24bls389@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #83054 |
chrisv wrote: > Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> chrisv wrote: >>> >>>Sorry, don't need to read any more of your right-wing propaganda, >>>right now. >> >>Translation: "Sorry, don't need to do anything but remain >>brainwashed and ignorant because it's easier to engage in >>name-calling." > >Of course, lots of worthless, lying trolls make that absurd >"translation". "Slimer" reply to the above was deleted, unread. Oh, but thanks to vallor's quoting of Slime's "Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:23:38 -0400" post, I am no longer "ignorant" of Slime calling me a "Bleeding-heart liberal imbecile". Gosh, that's real "important" information that I'm missing, when I ignore a "Slimer" post. Unless I read Slime's idiocy and lies, I will remain "brainwashed and ignorant". -- "If the advocates had their way, they'd indeed force the world to install GNU/Linux at gunpoint." - "Slimer", lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 09:03 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <r_edneRLp5wvSE7FnZ2dnUU7-N_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #83027 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:23:38 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <ob0i3b$p8q$1@dont-email.me>: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 > >On 23/03/17 08:59 AM, chrisv wrote: >>Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: >>>yesterday's events in London >>Were caused by one deranged person. > >Right, the liberal excuse for all Muslim terrorism. #NotAllMuslims, >right? It's always "mental illness" and can't possibly be the religion >of peace. tell us how the fact that 63% of violent attacks in the USA are perpetrated by whites makes you feel. > >>It's a great "example" for you propagandists to use, though. > >There are new ones every single day to choose from, that's the sad part. >Brain-dead liberal idiots like you will help to make sure that it keeps >happening and then, when they have the majority and vote in their own >with the desire to bring in Sharia, you'll wonder why all of your women >are being covered up and why your 6 year-old uncovered daughter is >being raped by some 50 year-old as the police stands by and does >nothing. It couldn't have possibly been your fault. > >>At least it was a real event, unlike your hero Trump's completely >>made-up "yesterday in Sweden" story. Is Obama still tapping his >>phones? > >Nunes just confirmed that Trump and his administration had indeed been >tapped into _yesterday_. How the _fuck_ did you miss that? The liberal >media is claiming that there was no wiretap whereas everyone else quoted >him directly as stating that yes, it happened to the President-Elect. >It is the latest exhibition of the liberal media's lies... the lies you >willingly believe. ><http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/22/nunes-unmasking-rep >o rt-vindicates-trump-claims-surveillance/> > >As for "yesterday in Sweden," Trump was AGAIN proven correct and the >police in Sweden was quick to confirm that there are indeed no-go zones >in the country. In fact, here's an independent reporter's demonstration >of that. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pochreLwrQs> Trump was >referring to a documentary he had watched (and the media purposely >removed the context) but people quickly came to his defense since he >was telling the truth. > >>Fire-up those ovens, "Slimer". > >Bleeding-heart liberal imbecile. > >- -- Silver-Tongued Heel Korora Linux Sponsor EFF & OpenMedia Member >Gab.ai: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 > >iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJY08xaAAoJEECBkWZkIkW3yb0P/jJfVFUhlCG3L3b5l9Gdapek >IQdkUY/SQa3lwzsUi/jhVm5pQGn5cheakvdbATiQjJkMDQJr9wKZ2GFt8H6hMgT6 >Z8NQMyl/noUnhSTlhnwM3Hv3yCOdU6oo6EDrmEZRkxoR57FN6Xbd2A0h9bjavTj0 >aQVGhdu9L1VCJyPP8jeumo+eC62MNW+NOuxVZVzMxoUuUT6fUavM5NPt20L4Bg9O >P57CCQUDN+XSNHFjmBzRe5HTFMU4P1pSIQdakDLEMtivvceh/0/7xjLwfsJU61sy >lSi6nwJS5/F9zgkgfFEwDrKFn4P9B8uzHfXwpfwUkL3xsIZSHIj2PIijc3Yhpv3L >EoJ+qqbyPclHqKDu3RbkBBsinXtGlBLBpHuobRfKNN2LgfoamRmOzuHLeICd72UL >80N6mOhGbHogg9oXJjVhDFhBFFa2SNFryJXcJrA5S4LepklerHaY6icH+pcVZzt4 >+eUzGN5kJ277A820JXc2dUcMarlnDNhgDFVDyfyMgekRU5ts42gpJFJo177dt6NR >ntR5vlBpKoBEsTt11c99QkcGee6mRxTiocuvY097Abx2CJcxCUSo+IrrCGpf3r7v >uKc8rLUUqGPu0OL9zMO8dB6TqpyEVeZPPvI3Pc/Sp3xJOsOhhrK2kffpQO4oh64A >sV5qZI3e2nbhCXsZvMBc =bIk0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 13:08 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <ob0v9q$9n9$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #83029 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 23/03/17 10:03 AM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:23:38 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "Silver-Tongued > Heel <sl@im.er>" determined that the following was of great > importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <ob0i3b$p8q$1@dont-email.me>: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 23/03/17 08:59 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: >>>> yesterday's events in London >>> Were caused by one deranged person. >> >> Right, the liberal excuse for all Muslim terrorism. >> #NotAllMuslims, right? It's always "mental illness" and can't >> possibly be the religion of peace. > > tell us how the fact that 63% of violent attacks in the USA are > perpetrated by whites makes you feel. Your statistic is incorrect. - -- Silver-Tongued Heel Korora Linux Sponsor EFF & OpenMedia Member Gab.ai: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJY1AEqAAoJEECBkWZkIkW3qRYP/0W4xHxY2p5zgjXn2oikeVER bP2OX3OqWS6XSH4qyDfj82373mX5Ne+/YsZ4lEOBGPcqBZqM1L+iRzKq3pTHbtjM WWDFQ0YZrp8XB/EGmbocbfn/Yrz8K0qFwSV6F3Hw8bjfltI5+hGPqORQ6Vd+yM85 x0ItROWkEbHcHnduDSsr2gYLhjYnsJRDTU8rmo9moaKrcG6XcWmUt+cNPkOcMqDZ sauog0zh7v4jvMXY0M7tGxfc0TcFzhrkwl5RXm126JMbH3B2Ve4OSKZN5dQLOQax KDQ/5iAMAOtbo4pKlce8siQygevGsSR5jcjxJx4uEQH6tmVDa+VwcjAncaxnijDt TXKUEReC/3tSad8MSK+K0H0egFOXTjvzYJM/0NcBvSnspYS2bZvV7VQabviGEQDd jCm7GfoogaE3IekTbXg1memoQj+guVUjdx9vq9r3N3ssGLzRD8zIsM+McodRFSNV 2KAZdrfBiQI3HSVs7ZZRfMyN2AkqHC26WFXlilERBhnreBBNOBAaB3zwcL3Pnqx0 LHXXDy+qPZERQuiojnh9d3qiB1iZW8fpRaJBmcQkPh28PbHf2P5S9+jUV5YJb2e6 0xFfdpjZe/RmmPsNlHRxRWor2lS+6Fy4Q3un0o2uyu4W9Kd1EQVJ9Yxt2tkoPbWW XW8A8VOJ+hhfj8EYa22f =1Xvo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 12:43 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <4ZidnY8ZcMXFlEnFnZ2dnUU7-aXNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #83034 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:08:58 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <ob0v9q$9n9$3@dont-email.me>: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 > >On 23/03/17 10:03 AM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? wrote: >>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:23:38 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "Silver-Tongued Heel >><sl@im.er>" determined that the following was of great importance and >>subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >><ob0i3b$p8q$1@dont-email.me>: >>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 23/03/17 08:59 AM, >>>chrisv wrote: >>>>Silver-Tongued Heel wrote: >>>>>yesterday's events in London >>>>Were caused by one deranged person. >>>Right, the liberal excuse for all Muslim terrorism. #NotAllMuslims, >>>right? It's always "mental illness" and can't possibly be the religion >>>of peace. >>tell us how the fact that 63% of violent attacks in the USA are >>perpetrated by whites makes you feel. > >Your statistic is incorrect. no it isn't. look at crime statistics: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43 TOTAL OFFENSES: 9,014,635 Whites: 6,214,197 FREE CLUE: 6,214,197 / 9,014,635 = 0.6893453811496528 AKA 68.9% Blacks: 2,549,655 American Indian or Alaska Native: 140,290 Asian: 105,109 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander: 5,384 look at rape statistics: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43 Total Rapes: 13,515 Rapes by whites: 8,946 = 66% of total rapes in 2013 Rapes by blacks: 4,229 = 31% of total rapes in 2013 May I ask if you have some sort of mental "problem" that presents some sort of cognitive dissonance about being shown actual bona-fide facts and not "alternative facts"? look at FBI murder stats: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expanded_homicide_data_table_6_murder_race_and_sex_of_vicitm_by_race_and_sex_of_offender_2013.xls http://tinyurl.com/gm3k9uf if you can actually manage to read a table of information (which i have my doubts about), you'll be noting that in 2013 of 3,005 whites murdered 2,509 were murdered by whites. this means that 83.5% of white people murdered are murdered by another white person - not a muslim or any kind of other political-rhetoric boogeyman that the alt-right neo-nazis are promulgating these days. note that these statistics don't include "accidents" like some SUV-driving goof putting her lipstick on while driving and driving through a school bus or your uncle zeke's hunting mishap, for instance. http://thefederalist.com/2015/02/02/vox-sets-out-to-prove-all-religions- are-equally-violent-and-fails/ Predominantly, Muslim countries average 2.4 murders per annum per 100,000 people, compared to 7.5 in non-Muslim countries. The percentage of the society that is made up of Muslims is an extraordinarily good predictor of a countryβs murder rate. More authoritarianism in Muslim countries does not account for the difference. I have found that controlling for political regime in statistical analysis does not change the findings. More Muslims, less homicide. but, i'm sure none of that matters. you said once, when pressed on the fact that whites commit more rapes (ie: more people are raped by whites): "Meh, it's not something that I truly care about either way. The statistics always speak about the totality of rapes but never take into consideration the percentage of the population which is part of a certain community. It's possible that in total number more whites commit rapes, but there's also more of them in the population. Blacks are far less numerous yet commit a comparable number of rapes anyway. Proper counting indeed shows that blacks and Muslims in general commit more than whites but there's no arguing that with imbeciles like Comrade Snot. " so i can tell that you are fact-resistant. i just like pushing your little buttons and watching you spew vitriol like a good little violent whiteboi. considering the totality of rapes would consider that X number of people got raped. you can't have that. doesn't fit your compulsion to try to hide the fact that most of the crimes committed are by whites. clearly, that's not something that you don't "truly care about" and it shows. >- -- Silver-Tongued Heel Korora Linux Sponsor EFF & OpenMedia Member >Gab.ai: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 > >iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJY1AEqAAoJEECBkWZkIkW3qRYP/0W4xHxY2p5zgjXn2oikeVER >bP2OX3OqWS6XSH4qyDfj82373mX5Ne+/YsZ4lEOBGPcqBZqM1L+iRzKq3pTHbtjM >WWDFQ0YZrp8XB/EGmbocbfn/Yrz8K0qFwSV6F3Hw8bjfltI5+hGPqORQ6Vd+yM85 >x0ItROWkEbHcHnduDSsr2gYLhjYnsJRDTU8rmo9moaKrcG6XcWmUt+cNPkOcMqDZ >sauog0zh7v4jvMXY0M7tGxfc0TcFzhrkwl5RXm126JMbH3B2Ve4OSKZN5dQLOQax >KDQ/5iAMAOtbo4pKlce8siQygevGsSR5jcjxJx4uEQH6tmVDa+VwcjAncaxnijDt >TXKUEReC/3tSad8MSK+K0H0egFOXTjvzYJM/0NcBvSnspYS2bZvV7VQabviGEQDd >jCm7GfoogaE3IekTbXg1memoQj+guVUjdx9vq9r3N3ssGLzRD8zIsM+McodRFSNV >2KAZdrfBiQI3HSVs7ZZRfMyN2AkqHC26WFXlilERBhnreBBNOBAaB3zwcL3Pnqx0 >LHXXDy+qPZERQuiojnh9d3qiB1iZW8fpRaJBmcQkPh28PbHf2P5S9+jUV5YJb2e6 >0xFfdpjZe/RmmPsNlHRxRWor2lS+6Fy4Q3un0o2uyu4W9Kd1EQVJ9Yxt2tkoPbWW >XW8A8VOJ+hhfj8EYa22f =1Xvo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 14:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Message-ID | <ob1d8r$hh7$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #83038 |
x-no-archive: yes On 3/23/2017 10:43 AM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:08:58 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "Silver-Tongued Heel > <sl@im.er>" determined that the following was of great importance and > subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <ob0v9q$9n9$3@dont-email.me>: >> Your statistic is incorrect. > > no it isn't. > > look at crime statistics: > > https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43 > > TOTAL OFFENSES: 9,014,635 > > Whites: 6,214,197 FREE CLUE: 6,214,197 / 9,014,635 = 0.6893453811496528 AKA 68.9% > > Blacks: 2,549,655 > American Indian or Alaska Native: 140,290 > Asian: 105,109 > Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander: 5,384 So whites are arrested at a lower rate than their share of the general population, while blacks are arrested twice as much per capita? OK. > look at rape statistics: > > https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43 > > Total Rapes: 13,515 > Rapes by whites: 8,946 = 66% of total rapes in 2013 > Rapes by blacks: 4,229 = 31% of total rapes in 2013 > > May I ask if you have some sort of mental "problem" that presents some sort of cognitive dissonance about being shown actual bona-fide facts and not "alternative facts"? Indeed. Whites = 72.4% of the population of the US Blacks = 12.6% of the population of the US So 31% of rapes are committed by black while they only have ~12% of the population? In other words, a black person is ~3x as likely to commit rape as a white person. Interesting.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 16:10 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β |
| Message-ID | <KuSdnYeGu69DpEnFnZ2dnUU7-WnNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #83063 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:04:26 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <ob1d8r$hh7$1@news.albasani.net>: >x-no-archive: yes > >On 3/23/2017 10:43 AM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ >wrote: >>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:08:58 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "Silver-Tongued Heel >><sl@im.er>" determined that the following was of great importance and >>subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >><ob0v9q$9n9$3@dont-email.me>: > >>>Your statistic is incorrect. >>no it isn't. look at crime statistics: >>https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables >>/table-43 TOTAL OFFENSES: 9,014,635 Whites: 6,214,197 FREE CLUE: >>6,214,197 / 9,014,635 = 0.6893453811496528 AKA 68.9% Blacks: 2,549,655 >>American Indian or Alaska Native: 140,290 Asian: 105,109 Native >>Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander: 5,384 > >So whites are arrested at a lower rate than their share of the general >population, while blacks are arrested twice as much per capita? OK. > >>look at rape statistics: >>https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables >>/table-43 Total Rapes: 13,515 Rapes by whites: 8,946 = >>66% of total rapes in 2013 Rapes by blacks: 4,229 = 31% of total rapes >>in 2013 May I ask if you have some sort of mental "problem" that >>presents some sort of cognitive dissonance about being shown actual >>bona-fide facts and not "alternative facts"? > >Indeed. > >Whites = 72.4% of the population of the US Blacks = 12.6% of the >population of the US > >So 31% of rapes are committed by black while they only have ~12% of the >population? In other words, a black person is ~3x as likely to commit >rape as a white person. Interesting. yet, a person who is raped is still 100% raped. imagine that! i bet rape victims are so very concerned about your findings! -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 14:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β |
| Message-ID | <ob1e0v$gbh$3@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #83065 |
x-no-archive: yes On 3/23/2017 2:10 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:04:26 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor > <Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great > importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <ob1d8r$hh7$1@news.albasani.net>: > >> x-no-archive: yes >> >> On 3/23/2017 10:43 AM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus Γ°ΕΈΒ¢ç¬⺠>> wrote: >>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:08:58 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "Silver-Tongued Heel >>> <sl@im.er>" determined that the following was of great importance and >>> subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>> <ob0v9q$9n9$3@dont-email.me>: >> >>>> Your statistic is incorrect. >>> no it isn't. look at crime statistics: >>> https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables >>> /table-43 TOTAL OFFENSES: 9,014,635 Whites: 6,214,197 FREE CLUE: >>> 6,214,197 / 9,014,635 = 0.6893453811496528 AKA 68.9% Blacks: 2,549,655 >>> American Indian or Alaska Native: 140,290 Asian: 105,109 Native >>> Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander: 5,384 >> >> So whites are arrested at a lower rate than their share of the general >> population, while blacks are arrested twice as much per capita? OK. >> >>> look at rape statistics: >>> https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables >>> /table-43 Total Rapes: 13,515 Rapes by whites: 8,946 = >>> 66% of total rapes in 2013 Rapes by blacks: 4,229 = 31% of total rapes >>> in 2013 May I ask if you have some sort of mental "problem" that >>> presents some sort of cognitive dissonance about being shown actual >>> bona-fide facts and not "alternative facts"? >> >> Indeed. >> >> Whites = 72.4% of the population of the US Blacks = 12.6% of the >> population of the US >> >> So 31% of rapes are committed by black while they only have ~12% of the >> population? In other words, a black person is ~3x as likely to commit >> rape as a white person. Interesting. > > yet, a person who is raped is still 100% raped. imagine that! > > i bet rape victims are so very concerned about your findings! So then why were you crowing when you thought whites were proven to be more violent? Why weren't you saying the same thing then? Admission that you're wrong noted and recorded.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 16:25 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β β Snowflake β |
| Message-ID | <IdWdnbJAy7qhoEnFnZ2dnUU7-KPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #83069 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:17:18 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <ob1e0v$gbh$3@news.albasani.net>: >x-no-archive: yes > >On 3/23/2017 2:10 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ >wrote: >>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:04:26 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor >><Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great >>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >><ob1d8r$hh7$1@news.albasani.net>: >>>x-no-archive: yes On 3/23/2017 10:43 AM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder >>>Emeritus Γ°ΕΈΒ¢ç¬⺠wrote: >>>>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:08:58 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "Silver-Tongued Heel >>>><sl@im.er>" determined that the following was of great importance and >>>>subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>><ob0v9q$9n9$3@dont-email.me>: >>> >>>>>Your statistic is incorrect. >>>>no it isn't. look at crime statistics: >>>>https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables >>>>/table-43 TOTAL OFFENSES: 9,014,635 Whites: 6,214,197 FREE CLUE: >>>>6,214,197 / 9,014,635 = 0.6893453811496528 AKA 68.9% Blacks: 2,549,655 >>>>American Indian or Alaska Native: 140,290 Asian: 105,109 Native >>>>Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander: 5,384 >>>So whites are arrested at a lower rate than their share of the general >>>population, while blacks are arrested twice as much per capita? OK. >>>>look at rape statistics: >>>>https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables >>>>/table-43 Total Rapes: 13,515 Rapes by whites: 8,946 = >>>>66% of total rapes in 2013 Rapes by blacks: 4,229 = 31% of total rapes >>>>in 2013 May I ask if you have some sort of mental "problem" that >>>>presents some sort of cognitive dissonance about being shown actual >>>>bona-fide facts and not "alternative facts"? >>>Indeed. Whites = 72.4% of the population of the US Blacks = 12.6% of the >>>population of the US So 31% of rapes are committed by black while they >>>only have ~12% of the population? In other words, a black person is ~3x >>>as likely to commit rape as a white person. Interesting. >>yet, a person who is raped is still 100% raped. imagine that! i bet >>rape victims are so very concerned about your findings! > >So then why were you crowing when you thought whites were proven to be >more violent? Why weren't you saying the same thing then? i was saying that if you're worried about getting raped: more whites commit rapes. if you're worried about getting murdered: more whites commit murders. if you're an idiot and want to worry about some races of people that aren't even anywhere near you most of the time doing things that they are most likely going to do of those of their own race or in their own families, be my guest. you look like a fool. >Admission that you're wrong noted and recorded. and what was i wrong about, exactly? you are approaching the problem as if victims have a choice in the race of the person who victimizes them. mostly because you possess the thought processes and ego of a small child. -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 14:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β β Snowflake β |
| Message-ID | <ob1fav$ef1$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #83073 |
x-no-archive: yes On 3/23/2017 2:25 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ wrote: > i was saying that if you're worried about getting raped: more whites commit rapes. > > if you're worried about getting murdered: more whites commit murders. > > if you're an idiot and want to worry about some races of people that aren't even anywhere near you most of the time doing things that they are most likely going to do of those of their own race or in their own families, be my guest. > > you look like a fool. Right. And Nigeria has a higher GDP than Singapore, so if you want to be rich, go to Nigeria. >> Admission that you're wrong noted and recorded. > > and what was i wrong about, exactly? you are approaching the problem as if victims have a choice in the race of the person who victimizes them. > > mostly because you possess the thought processes and ego of a small child. Ad hominem attack noted and recorded. Nice, uh, "logic".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 16:42 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right β Snowflake β |
| Message-ID | <T5WdnU3q-avZ3EnFnZ2dnUU7-T3NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #83080 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:39:41 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <ob1fav$ef1$1@news.albasani.net>: >x-no-archive: yes > >On 3/23/2017 2:25 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ >wrote: > >>i was saying that if you're worried about getting raped: more whites >>commit rapes. if you're worried about getting murdered: more whites >>commit murders. if you're an idiot and want to worry about some races >>of people that aren't even anywhere near you most of the time doing >>things that they are most likely going to do of those of their own race >>or in their own families, be my guest. you look like a fool. > >Right. And Nigeria has a higher GDP than Singapore, so if you want to >be rich, go to Nigeria. > >>>Admission that you're wrong noted and recorded. >>and what was i wrong about, exactly? you are approaching the problem as >>if victims have a choice in the race of the person who victimizes them. >>mostly because you possess the thought processes and ego of a small >>child. > >Ad hominem attack noted and recorded. Nice, uh, "logic". > so since you're an expert at logical fallacies... which one is it when you try to equate a person of a certain race with all others of that race, in particular, the others who may have committed some crime? <JEOPARDY MUSIC> -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 14:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right β Snowflake β |
| Message-ID | <ob1fke$eej$3@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #83083 |
x-no-archive: yes On 3/23/2017 2:42 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:39:41 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor > <Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great > importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <ob1fav$ef1$1@news.albasani.net>: > >> x-no-archive: yes >> >> On 3/23/2017 2:25 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus Γ°ΕΈΒ¢ç¬⺠>> wrote: >> >>> i was saying that if you're worried about getting raped: more whites >>> commit rapes. if you're worried about getting murdered: more whites >>> commit murders. if you're an idiot and want to worry about some races >>> of people that aren't even anywhere near you most of the time doing >>> things that they are most likely going to do of those of their own race >>> or in their own families, be my guest. you look like a fool. >> >> Right. And Nigeria has a higher GDP than Singapore, so if you want to >> be rich, go to Nigeria. >> >>>> Admission that you're wrong noted and recorded. >>> and what was i wrong about, exactly? you are approaching the problem as >>> if victims have a choice in the race of the person who victimizes them. >>> mostly because you possess the thought processes and ego of a small >>> child. >> >> Ad hominem attack noted and recorded. Nice, uh, "logic". >> > > so since you're an expert at logical fallacies... > > which one is it when you try to equate a person of a certain race with all others of that race, in particular, the others who may have committed some crime? > > <JEOPARDY MUSIC> It's called being stupid, no argument from me in that case.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 16:46 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not e β Snowflake β |
| Message-ID | <lMGdnT1Av9yp30nFnZ2dnUU7-QPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #83084 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:44:45 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <ob1fke$eej$3@news.albasani.net>: >x-no-archive: yes > >On 3/23/2017 2:42 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ >wrote: >>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:39:41 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor >><Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great >>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >><ob1fav$ef1$1@news.albasani.net>: >>>x-no-archive: yes On 3/23/2017 2:25 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder >>>Emeritus Γ°ΕΈΒ¢ç¬⺠wrote: >>>>i was saying that if you're worried about getting raped: more whites >>>>commit rapes. if you're worried about getting murdered: more whites >>>>commit murders. if you're an idiot and want to worry about some races >>>>of people that aren't even anywhere near you most of the time doing >>>>things that they are most likely going to do of those of their own race >>>>or in their own families, be my guest. you look like a fool. >>>Right. And Nigeria has a higher GDP than Singapore, so if you want to >>>be rich, go to Nigeria. >>>>>Admission that you're wrong noted and recorded. >>>>and what was i wrong about, exactly? you are approaching the problem as >>>>if victims have a choice in the race of the person who victimizes them. >>>>mostly because you possess the thought processes and ego of a small >>>>child. >>>Ad hominem attack noted and recorded. Nice, uh, "logic". >>so since you're an expert at logical fallacies... which one is it when >>you try to equate a person of a certain race with all others of that >>race, in particular, the others who may have committed some crime? >><JEOPARDY MUSIC> > >It's called being stupid, no argument from me in that case. > then you clearly must have undying support for hard-working muslim americans and their families? -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 15:00 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not e β Snowflake β |
| Message-ID | <ob1gi4$bro$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #83086 |
x-no-archive: yes On 3/23/2017 2:46 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:44:45 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor > <Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great > importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <ob1fke$eej$3@news.albasani.net>: > >> x-no-archive: yes >> >> On 3/23/2017 2:42 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus Γ°ΕΈΒ¢ç¬⺠>> wrote: >>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:39:41 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor >>> <Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great >>> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>> <ob1fav$ef1$1@news.albasani.net>: >>>> x-no-archive: yes On 3/23/2017 2:25 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder >>>> Emeritus Γ°à ¸ΓΒΓΒΆΓ§ìÒβ¬ΒΊ wrote: >>>>> i was saying that if you're worried about getting raped: more whites >>>>> commit rapes. if you're worried about getting murdered: more whites >>>>> commit murders. if you're an idiot and want to worry about some races >>>>> of people that aren't even anywhere near you most of the time doing >>>>> things that they are most likely going to do of those of their own race >>>>> or in their own families, be my guest. you look like a fool. >>>> Right. And Nigeria has a higher GDP than Singapore, so if you want to >>>> be rich, go to Nigeria. >>>>>> Admission that you're wrong noted and recorded. >>>>> and what was i wrong about, exactly? you are approaching the problem as >>>>> if victims have a choice in the race of the person who victimizes them. >>>>> mostly because you possess the thought processes and ego of a small >>>>> child. >>>> Ad hominem attack noted and recorded. Nice, uh, "logic". >>> so since you're an expert at logical fallacies... which one is it when >>> you try to equate a person of a certain race with all others of that >>> race, in particular, the others who may have committed some crime? >>> <JEOPARDY MUSIC> >> >> It's called being stupid, no argument from me in that case. >> > > then you clearly must have undying support for hard-working muslim americans and their families? If they're citizens and obeying the law, of course. Why would you ask such a dumb question?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 17:04 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β β Snowflake β |
| Message-ID | <RuKdnTYYhPrK20nFnZ2dnUU7-b_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #83088 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:00:36 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <ob1gi4$bro$1@news.albasani.net>: >x-no-archive: yes > >On 3/23/2017 2:46 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ >wrote: >>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:44:45 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor >><Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great >>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >><ob1fke$eej$3@news.albasani.net>: >>>x-no-archive: yes On 3/23/2017 2:42 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder >>>Emeritus Γ°ΕΈΒ¢ç¬⺠wrote: >>>>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:39:41 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor >>>><Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great >>>>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>><ob1fav$ef1$1@news.albasani.net>: >>>>>x-no-archive: yes On 3/23/2017 2:25 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder >>>>>Emeritus Γ°à ¸ΓΒΓΒΆΓ§ìÒβ¬ΒΊ wrote: >>>>>>i was saying that if you're worried about getting raped: more whites >>>>>>commit rapes. if you're worried about getting murdered: more whites >>>>>>commit murders. if you're an idiot and want to worry about some races >>>>>>of people that aren't even anywhere near you most of the time doing >>>>>>things that they are most likely going to do of those of their own race >>>>>>or in their own families, be my guest. you look like a fool. >>>>>Right. And Nigeria has a higher GDP than Singapore, so if you want to >>>>>be rich, go to Nigeria. >>>>>>>Admission that you're wrong noted and recorded. >>>>>>and what was i wrong about, exactly? you are approaching the problem as >>>>>>if victims have a choice in the race of the person who victimizes them. >>>>>>mostly because you possess the thought processes and ego of a small >>>>>>child. >>>>>Ad hominem attack noted and recorded. Nice, uh, "logic". >>>>so since you're an expert at logical fallacies... which one is it when >>>>you try to equate a person of a certain race with all others of that >>>>race, in particular, the others who may have committed some crime? >>>><JEOPARDY MUSIC> >>>It's called being stupid, no argument from me in that case. >>then you clearly must have undying support for hard-working muslim >>americans and their families? > >If they're citizens and obeying the law, of course. Why would you ask >such a dumb question? o, perhaps because you're seen publicly defending the rantings of an anti-muslim breitbart-link spamming chicken-little goof, maybe? -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 15:06 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β β Snowflake β |
| Message-ID | <ob1gtb$agn$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #83089 |
x-no-archive: yes On 3/23/2017 3:04 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:00:36 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor > <Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great > importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <ob1gi4$bro$1@news.albasani.net>: > >> x-no-archive: yes >> >> On 3/23/2017 2:46 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus Γ°ΕΈΒ¢ç¬⺠>> wrote: >>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:44:45 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor >>> <Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great >>> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>> <ob1fke$eej$3@news.albasani.net>: >>>> x-no-archive: yes On 3/23/2017 2:42 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder >>>> Emeritus Γ°à ¸ΓΒΓΒΆΓ§ìÒβ¬ΒΊ wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:39:41 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor >>>>> <Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great >>>>> importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>>> <ob1fav$ef1$1@news.albasani.net>: >>>>>> x-no-archive: yes On 3/23/2017 2:25 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder >>>>>> Emeritus ΓΖΓΒ°Γβ¦ΓΒΈΓβΓΒΓβΓΒΆΓΖΓΒ§ΓβΓΒ¬ΓΒ’Γ’βΒ¬ΓΒΊ wrote: >>>>>>> i was saying that if you're worried about getting raped: more whites >>>>>>> commit rapes. if you're worried about getting murdered: more whites >>>>>>> commit murders. if you're an idiot and want to worry about some races >>>>>>> of people that aren't even anywhere near you most of the time doing >>>>>>> things that they are most likely going to do of those of their own race >>>>>>> or in their own families, be my guest. you look like a fool. >>>>>> Right. And Nigeria has a higher GDP than Singapore, so if you want to >>>>>> be rich, go to Nigeria. >>>>>>>> Admission that you're wrong noted and recorded. >>>>>>> and what was i wrong about, exactly? you are approaching the problem as >>>>>>> if victims have a choice in the race of the person who victimizes them. >>>>>>> mostly because you possess the thought processes and ego of a small >>>>>>> child. >>>>>> Ad hominem attack noted and recorded. Nice, uh, "logic". >>>>> so since you're an expert at logical fallacies... which one is it when >>>>> you try to equate a person of a certain race with all others of that >>>>> race, in particular, the others who may have committed some crime? >>>>> <JEOPARDY MUSIC> >>>> It's called being stupid, no argument from me in that case. >>> then you clearly must have undying support for hard-working muslim >>> americans and their families? >> >> If they're citizens and obeying the law, of course. Why would you ask >> such a dumb question? > > o, perhaps because you're seen publicly defending the rantings of an anti-muslim breitbart-link spamming chicken-little goof, maybe? I thought you were supposed to be smart?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 21:00 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β β Snowflake β |
| Message-ID | <ob1que$d1h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #83073 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 23/03/17 05:25 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:17:18 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor > <Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great > importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <ob1e0v$gbh$3@news.albasani.net>: > >> x-no-archive: yes >> >> On 3/23/2017 2:10 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus >> Γ°ΕΈΒ¢ç¬⺠wrote: >>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:04:26 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor >>> <Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of >>> great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it >>> with us in <ob1d8r$hh7$1@news.albasani.net>: >>>> x-no-archive: yes On 3/23/2017 10:43 AM, Fakey's Puppy >>>> Whistle Holder Emeritus Γ°à ¸ΓΒΓΒΆΓ§ìÒβ¬ΒΊ wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:08:58 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; >>>>> "Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er>" determined that the >>>>> following was of great importance and subsequently decided >>>>> to freely share it with us in >>>>> <ob0v9q$9n9$3@dont-email.me>: >>>> >>>>>> Your statistic is incorrect. >>>>> no it isn't. look at crime statistics: >>>>> https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/t ables >>>>> >>>>> /table-43 TOTAL OFFENSES: 9,014,635 Whites: 6,214,197 FREE CLUE: >>>>> 6,214,197 / 9,014,635 = 0.6893453811496528 AKA 68.9% >>>>> Blacks: 2,549,655 American Indian or Alaska Native: 140,290 >>>>> Asian: 105,109 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander: >>>>> 5,384 >>>> So whites are arrested at a lower rate than their share of >>>> the general population, while blacks are arrested twice as >>>> much per capita? OK. >>>>> look at rape statistics: >>>>> https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/t ables >>>>> >>>>> /table-43 Total Rapes: 13,515 Rapes by whites: 8,946 = >>>>> 66% of total rapes in 2013 Rapes by blacks: 4,229 = 31% of >>>>> total rapes in 2013 May I ask if you have some sort of >>>>> mental "problem" that presents some sort of cognitive >>>>> dissonance about being shown actual bona-fide facts and not >>>>> "alternative facts"? >>>> Indeed. Whites = 72.4% of the population of the US Blacks = >>>> 12.6% of the population of the US So 31% of rapes are >>>> committed by black while they only have ~12% of the >>>> population? In other words, a black person is ~3x as likely >>>> to commit rape as a white person. Interesting. >>> yet, a person who is raped is still 100% raped. imagine that! >>> i bet rape victims are so very concerned about your findings! >> >> So then why were you crowing when you thought whites were proven >> to be more violent? Why weren't you saying the same thing then? > > i was saying that if you're worried about getting raped: more > whites commit rapes. > > if you're worried about getting murdered: more whites commit > murders. Apparently, mathematics weren't your strength in elementary and high school. A strong proportion of those crime were committed by members of a race whose total population is less than 20%. As such, you're more likely to be raped by a black guy than a white guy regardless of the total number of crimes. > if you're an idiot and want to worry about some races of people > that aren't even anywhere near you most of the time doing things > that they are most likely going to do of those of their own race or > in their own families, be my guest. > > you look like a fool. YOU look like a fool for being unable to properly post onto Usenet and forcing us to word wrap. ... - -- Silver-Tongued Heel Korora Linux Sponsor EFF & OpenMedia Member Gab.ai: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJY1G+9AAoJEECBkWZkIkW3xBYP/2KlnYsRgGP03bL/N5/T8kIG cJk+yEGsxthxs14mc/YMB2Fa+93LkjGGGqUu7icgGBuTKZm/x/5V6qmltY5i6Epr /8/cHupEWZJ9mGhE3pT+qfHvtIVKenbQCafZelIgdhOUnnA4wOKspVXc0VUZyQif IK8S/fQvjb08Uuc/n1N9qQYpX2gJbeCGDAG5qdZ3VLYSYHHyFEjuHTvS44EaUxuj fiFbwqwH0Ak5AcWIFbVCd/0U95cQmv2kKMtVB6xdalAgiUX4mZZ/C02BgQNQx8mL Iz41yVlGdY2Wr8RslyXXB4ZVefPgtITmHl/EcjqLo9GXkUfiF1xK+JdXpwAQaZi7 mkgrMUQv8tk40YlWTBGf0ZA74evHYu3n29Z1vFHzFL1TIucL9ji57t3545Bva9gD qWPc75nrYeNmROP4gHi76V0SwAVmkgveisQU7EBuod2N7vZrAdVcJkh4JcEmhoNI DWq69JEUPiDFWCrS70oUIFSa8DzhcJwzvhrRMBkiHzrvftFaTJUELDUn+ASVicU+ aJkmhH69MIYK8TLMtDDM8P6JW6gLIs7bADeT+YaxcR25oZcU68Rbn2GWK1ukzteE VikhorHh/ER4y2nsrf3Qxuj9lB9BnT3vS/cwKMe3A0qoG1vAahz8DIfdAC+Ag2Vq FW2vq9TpAo6ZO3msmUp5 =TN6K -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-23 22:49 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right β Snowflake β |
| Message-ID | <JfudnfKNx6_ICknFnZ2dnUU7-T3NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #83119 |
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:00:45 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <ob1que$d1h$1@dont-email.me>: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 > >On 23/03/17 05:25 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ??? wrote: >>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:17:18 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor >><Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great >>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >><ob1e0v$gbh$3@news.albasani.net>: >>>x-no-archive: yes On 3/23/2017 2:10 PM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder >>>Emeritus πΆη¬ wrote: >>>>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:04:26 -0700, LO AND BEHOLD; "Janithor >>>><Janithor@comcast.net>" determined that the following was of great >>>>importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>><ob1d8r$hh7$1@news.albasani.net>: >>>>>x-no-archive: yes On 3/23/2017 10:43 AM, Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder >>>>>Emeritus Γ°ΕΈΒ¢ç¬⺠wrote: >>>>>>On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:08:58 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "Silver-Tongued Heel >>>>>><sl@im.er>" determined that the following was of great importance and >>>>>>subsequently decided to freely share it with us in >>>>>><ob0v9q$9n9$3@dont-email.me>: >>>>> >>>>>>>Your statistic is incorrect. >>>>>>no it isn't. look at crime statistics: >>>>>>https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/t >ables >>>>>> >/table-43 TOTAL OFFENSES: 9,014,635 Whites: 6,214,197 FREE CLUE: >>>>>>6,214,197 / 9,014,635 = 0.6893453811496528 AKA 68.9% Blacks: 2,549,655 >>>>>>American Indian or Alaska Native: 140,290 Asian: 105,109 Native >>>>>>Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander: 5,384 >>>>>So whites are arrested at a lower rate than their share of the general >>>>>population, while blacks are arrested twice as much per capita? OK. >>>>>>look at rape statistics: >>>>>>https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/t >ables >>>>>> >/table-43 Total Rapes: 13,515 Rapes by whites: 8,946 = >>>>>>66% of total rapes in 2013 Rapes by blacks: 4,229 = 31% of total rapes >>>>>>in 2013 May I ask if you have some sort of mental "problem" that >>>>>>presents some sort of cognitive dissonance about being shown actual >>>>>>bona-fide facts and not "alternative facts"? >>>>>Indeed. Whites = 72.4% of the population of the US Blacks = 12.6% of the >>>>>population of the US So 31% of rapes are committed by black while they >>>>>only have ~12% of the population? In other words, a black person is ~3x >>>>>as likely to commit rape as a white person. Interesting. >>>>yet, a person who is raped is still 100% raped. imagine that! i bet >>>>rape victims are so very concerned about your findings! >>>So then why were you crowing when you thought whites were proven to be >>>more violent? Why weren't you saying the same thing then? >>i was saying that if you're worried about getting raped: more whites >>commit rapes. if you're worried about getting murdered: more whites >>commit murders. > >Apparently, mathematics weren't your strength in elementary and high >school. A strong proportion of those crime were committed by members of >a race whose total population is less than 20%. As such, you're more >likely to be raped by a black guy than a white guy regardless of the >total number of crimes. > >>if you're an idiot and want to worry about some races of people that >>aren't even anywhere near you most of the time doing things that they >>are most likely going to do of those of their own race or in their own >>families, be my guest. you look like a fool. > >YOU look like a fool for being unable to properly post onto Usenet and >forcing us to word wrap. > >... > >- -- Silver-Tongued Heel Korora Linux Sponsor EFF & OpenMedia Member >Gab.ai: @silverslimer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 > >iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJY1G+9AAoJEECBkWZkIkW3xBYP/2KlnYsRgGP03bL/N5/T8kIG >cJk+yEGsxthxs14mc/YMB2Fa+93LkjGGGqUu7icgGBuTKZm/x/5V6qmltY5i6Epr >/8/cHupEWZJ9mGhE3pT+qfHvtIVKenbQCafZelIgdhOUnnA4wOKspVXc0VUZyQif >IK8S/fQvjb08Uuc/n1N9qQYpX2gJbeCGDAG5qdZ3VLYSYHHyFEjuHTvS44EaUxuj >fiFbwqwH0Ak5AcWIFbVCd/0U95cQmv2kKMtVB6xdalAgiUX4mZZ/C02BgQNQx8mL >Iz41yVlGdY2Wr8RslyXXB4ZVefPgtITmHl/EcjqLo9GXkUfiF1xK+JdXpwAQaZi7 >mkgrMUQv8tk40YlWTBGf0ZA74evHYu3n29Z1vFHzFL1TIucL9ji57t3545Bva9gD >qWPc75nrYeNmROP4gHi76V0SwAVmkgveisQU7EBuod2N7vZrAdVcJkh4JcEmhoNI >DWq69JEUPiDFWCrS70oUIFSa8DzhcJwzvhrRMBkiHzrvftFaTJUELDUn+ASVicU+ >aJkmhH69MIYK8TLMtDDM8P6JW6gLIs7bADeT+YaxcR25oZcU68Rbn2GWK1ukzteE >VikhorHh/ER4y2nsrf3Qxuj9lB9BnT3vS/cwKMe3A0qoG1vAahz8DIfdAC+Ag2Vq >FW2vq9TpAo6ZO3msmUp5 =TN6K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > cry some more snowflake tears for us! -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 05:51 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? β Snowflake β β Snowflake β |
| Message-ID | <d00de635576df7b25694ede8eed64708@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #83119 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Silver-Tongued Heel, in <news:ob1que$d1h$1@dont-email.me> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On 23/03/17 05:25 PM, Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied > Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) of 5907 > Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, socked up as Fakey's Bitch wrote: > Apparently, mathematics weren't your strength in elementary and high > school. You noticed that, too, huh? Yeah, that's why he's known as The Mathematical Mega-Moron. Try not to get him started on the topic of sinusoids... he'll be flooding Usenet with poorly-made sinusoids and incorrect math again if you do that... he can't figure out Euler's equation, so he made his own kooky equation that guarantees he'll always get the wrong answer. <snicker> >> you look like a fool. How wrong are you? This wrong... \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS voltage was derived from. 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together. 3) You k'lamed a resultant of 0 volts between any two phases of 3-phase AC. 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed* gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third phase. 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts. 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side, then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12 kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference between voltage and apparent power. 7) You showed how you could derived any voltage of any polarity from 0 volts. 8) You *still* can't figure out why the resultant L-L of two phases of 3-phase AC would *lead* Phase A by 30 degrees... your kooky sinewave subtraction equation graphed it *lagging*. To fix that, you started using negative phase angles. 9) You lied and claimed that electrical engineers use negative phase sequencing to justify your having to use negative phase angles in your kooky sinewave subtraction equation. 10) You claimed that "signals of the same frequency and phase" (your words) undergo destructive interference. 11) You graphically converted 60 Hz 170 volt peak L-N to 30 Hz split-phase midpoint-neutral. 12) You graphically manufactured some wonky resultant sinewaves from 3-phase AC that somehow magically bunched together, which would cause a constantly varying phase angle between the resultants and their tributaries. 13) You demonstrated multiple times your inability to comprehend that a sinusoid is a circular function by attempting to calculate negative phase angles. And you even did that incorrectly. ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ You're obviously too low-IQ to keep from confusing yourself, as this has all been explained and the math laid out for you in the past. But then, you are the Mathematical Mega-Moron. > YOU look like a fool for being unable to properly post onto Usenet and > forcing us to word wrap. It's his crappy home-brew Usenet client... he's too poor to afford a real Usenet client. LOL He had to save up for months and months to buy a *used* welder... then decided to blow the saved money on crack, instead. That's why he's known as Cracky McCrackHead. LOL -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL No... 57 IQ. The paperwork *you* posted proves it. LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus πΆη¬ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-24 10:42 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly β Snowflake β |
| Message-ID | <rJmdnTBx4vLLo0jFnZ2dnUU7-YvNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #83138 |
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 05:51:23 +0100 (CET), LO AND BEHOLD; "Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <d00de635576df7b25694ede8eed64708@dizum.com>: >Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > >Silver-Tongued Heel, in <news:ob1que$d1h$1@dont-email.me> did thusly >jump head first into the wood chipper again: > >>On 23/03/17 05:25 PM, Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of >>Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) of 5907 Stanton Ave., >>Pittsburgh, PA, socked up as Fakey's Bitch wrote: > >>Apparently, mathematics weren't your strength in elementary and high >>school. > >You noticed that, too, huh? Yeah, that's why he's known as The >Mathematical Mega-Moron. > >Try not to get him started on the topic of sinusoids... he'll be >flooding Usenet with poorly-made sinusoids and incorrect math again if >you do that... he can't figure out Euler's equation, so he made his own >kooky equation that guarantees he'll always get the wrong answer. > ><snicker> > >>>you look like a fool. > >How wrong are you? This wrong... > >\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ >///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 1) >You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS voltage >was derived from. > >2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three >phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together. > >3) You k'lamed a resultant of 0 volts between any two phases of 3-phase >AC. > >4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed* gave >a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from each >of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180 degrees >phase from the remaining third phase. > >5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of >3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts. > >6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a >*substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side, >then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you >even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you >were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and >k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12 kVA" >(DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference between >voltage and apparent power. > >7) You showed how you could derived any voltage of any polarity from 0 >volts. > >8) You *still* can't figure out why the resultant L-L of two phases of >3-phase AC would *lead* Phase A by 30 degrees... your kooky sinewave >subtraction equation graphed it *lagging*. To fix that, you started >using negative phase angles. > >9) You lied and claimed that electrical engineers use negative phase >sequencing to justify your having to use negative phase angles in your >kooky sinewave subtraction equation. > >10) You claimed that "signals of the same frequency and phase" (your >words) undergo destructive interference. > >11) You graphically converted 60 Hz 170 volt peak L-N to 30 Hz >split-phase midpoint-neutral. > >12) You graphically manufactured some wonky resultant sinewaves from >3-phase AC that somehow magically bunched together, which would cause a >constantly varying phase angle between the resultants and their >tributaries. > >13) You demonstrated multiple times your inability to comprehend that a >sinusoid is a circular function by attempting to calculate negative >phase angles. And you even did that incorrectly. >///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ > >You're obviously too low-IQ to keep from confusing yourself, as this has >all been explained and the math laid out for you in the past. But then, >you are the Mathematical Mega-Moron. > >>YOU look like a fool for being unable to properly post onto Usenet and >>forcing us to word wrap. > >It's his crappy home-brew Usenet client... he's too poor to afford a >real Usenet client. LOL > >He had to save up for months and months to buy a *used* welder... then >decided to blow the saved money on crack, instead. That's why he's >known as Cracky McCrackHead. LOL and yet you can't even solve a simple dc voltage circuit! what's the amount of voltage that will be measured between a +12V conductor and a +1V conductor? your /addition/ answer of 13v isn't right, why is that? should i put it in ltspice for you and then you can continue to pretend that industry-standard circuit design software is somehow "wrong", because you're just THAT k0oky! -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-03-25 01:52 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: β Snowflake β Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly β Snowflake β |
| Message-ID | <21a6cfdb5eb11e73a77814fcf9009bb8@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #83159 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, socked up as Fakey's Bitch, in <news:rJmdnTBx4vLLo0jFnZ2dnUU7-YvNnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 05:51:23 +0100 (CET), LO AND BEHOLD; "Trump Team > <TeamTrump@gmail.com>" determined that the following was of great > importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <d00de635576df7b25694ede8eed64708@dizum.com>: >> Silver-Tongued Heel, in <news:ob1que$d1h$1@dont-email.me> did thusly >> jump head first into the wood chipper again: >>> On 23/03/17 05:25 PM, Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of >>> Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) of 5907 Stanton Ave., >>> Pittsburgh, PA, socked up as Fakey's Bitch wrote: >>> Apparently, mathematics weren't your strength in elementary and high >>> school. >> You noticed that, too, huh? Yeah, that's why he's known as The >> Mathematical Mega-Moron. >> >> Try not to get him started on the topic of sinusoids... he'll be >> flooding Usenet with poorly-made sinusoids and incorrect math again if >> you do that... he can't figure out Euler's equation, so he made his own >> kooky equation that guarantees he'll always get the wrong answer. >> >> <snicker> >>>> you look like a fool. >> How wrong are you? This wrong... >> >> \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ >> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 1) >> You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS voltage >> was derived from. >> >> 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three >> phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together. >> >> 3) You k'lamed a resultant of 0 volts between any two phases of 3-phase >> AC. >> >> 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed* gave >> a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from each >> of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180 degrees >> phase from the remaining third phase. >> >> 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of >> 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts. >> >> 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a >> *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side, >> then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you >> even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you >> were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and >> k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12 kVA" >> (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference between >> voltage and apparent power. >> >> 7) You showed how you could derived any voltage of any polarity from 0 >> volts. >> >> 8) You *still* can't figure out why the resultant L-L of two phases of >> 3-phase AC would *lead* Phase A by 30 degrees... your kooky sinewave >> subtraction equation graphed it *lagging*. To fix that, you started >> using negative phase angles. >> >> 9) You lied and claimed that electrical engineers use negative phase >> sequencing to justify your having to use negative phase angles in your >> kooky sinewave subtraction equation. >> >> 10) You claimed that "signals of the same frequency and phase" (your >> words) undergo destructive interference. >> >> 11) You graphically converted 60 Hz 170 volt peak L-N to 30 Hz >> split-phase midpoint-neutral. >> >> 12) You graphically manufactured some wonky resultant sinewaves from >> 3-phase AC that somehow magically bunched together, which would cause a >> constantly varying phase angle between the resultants and their >> tributaries. >> >> 13) You demonstrated multiple times your inability to comprehend that a >> sinusoid is a circular function by attempting to calculate negative >> phase angles. And you even did that incorrectly. >> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ >> >> You're obviously too low-IQ to keep from confusing yourself, as this has >> all been explained and the math laid out for you in the past. But then, >> you are the Mathematical Mega-Moron. >>> YOU look like a fool for being unable to properly post onto Usenet and >>> forcing us to word wrap. >> It's his crappy home-brew Usenet client... he's too poor to afford a >> real Usenet client. LOL >> >> He had to save up for months and months to buy a *used* welder... then >> decided to blow the saved money on crack, instead. That's why he's >> known as Cracky McCrackHead. LOL > a<SMACKADILDORIDER!> You're embarrassing yourself, DildoRider. Just admit you spent months and months proving yourself to be The Mathematical Mega-Moron, and you're *still* butthurt because of it, so you're backpedaling and attempting to conflate voltage measurement with sinusoid constructive and destructive interference. <snicker> -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL No... 57 IQ. The paperwork *you* posted proves it. LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 26 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 26 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | alt.checkmate
csiph-web