Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > alt.atheism > #3436184
| Subject | Re: Blasphemy Day |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.atheism, talk.atheism, alt.agnosticism, talk.philosophy.humanism, sci.skeptic |
| References | (3 earlier) <22201763-b808-d1a4-b787-079dea304b18@ashikaga.tokugawa> <8734leqyh7.fsf@comcast.net.invalid> <pttqfjhcuh0mgviucanc3cq0nm27n31kgf@4ax.com> <2cf4512a-8be6-647f-8a7f-a2b3d81d7bc8@ashikaga.tokugawa> <slrnvt5cum.2fmh.anthk@texto-plano.xyz> |
| From | jojo <f00@0f0.00f> |
| Organization | jieigyou |
| Message-ID | <be20e5d8-0555-023f-849e-8aff6ff5be87@shinku.aoyagi.konjou> (permalink) |
| Date | 2025-03-13 16:10 +0000 |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
anthk wrote: > On 2024-10-02, shogun <f00@0f0.00f> wrote: >> Bob Casanova wrote: >>> On Wed, 02 Oct 2024 09:08:20 -0700, the following appeared >>> in sci.skeptic, posted by Don_from_AZ >>> <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid>: >>> >>>> shogun <f00@0f0.00f> writes: >>>> >>>>> Bob Casanova wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:16:28 +0000, the following appeared in >>>>>> sci.skeptic, posted by sora <f00@0f0.00f>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> David Dalton wrote: >>>>>>>> Sept. 30 is Blasphemy Day, which from Wikipedia “educates >>>>>>>> individuals and groups about blasphemy laws and defends freedom >>>>>>>> of expression, especially the open criticism of religion which is >>>>>>>> criminalized in many countries”. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> religion from 2k or 1k or 200 or even 50 years ago is no longer >>>>>>> relevant. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Relevant to what? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> relevant to helping people navigate life in 2020s and post. >>>>> >>>> It's relevant if you live anywhere in the Islamic controlled world, and >>>> many other places as well. >>>> >>> Yep. The answer to which you replied is hopelessly >>> parochial; "it's irrelevant to my immediate social circle, >>> therefore it's irrelevant for everyone and everywhere". >>>> >> >> >> i would regard religious people as fundamentally wrong, being on >> the wrong side of history. being wrong also means it provides no >> benefit to its adherents. they are choosing to become obsolete. >> >> >> > > The closest to a religion I'd believe would be synchronicity+pansichysm, but far from > any judeo-christian/islamic sect or dogma. > there might be something to synchronicity, but panpsychism.... ehhh dont think so.
Back to alt.atheism | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Blasphemy Day anthk <anthk@openbsd.home> - 2025-03-13 11:23 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-13 16:10 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day Xx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com> - 2025-03-13 16:53 -0500
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-13 22:32 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day Xx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com> - 2025-03-13 20:53 -0500
Re: Blasphemy Day jojo <f00@0f0.00f> - 2025-03-14 02:14 +0000
Re: Blasphemy Day Xx/v]andrak|≡xX <xmfuller@t.query.com> - 2025-03-14 02:04 -0500
csiph-web