Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack.

From	Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201709.rodent.frell.theremailer.net>
References	(2 earlier) <oplr55$oia$1@dont-email.me> <opmi1o$93r$1@dont-email.me> <opn31k$tof$1@dont-email.me> <35b111927b362d30bf53f3d527899f28@dizum.com> <opod0p$9nh$1@dont-email.me>
Subject	Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack.
Message-ID	<301a0f52a832f35af210f1f0ebfd69d3@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> (permalink)
Date	2017-09-19 02:01 +0000
Newsgroups	alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.os.windows-10, comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.apache.configuration
Organization	dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In article <opod0p$9nh$1@dont-email.me>
"Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> wrote:
>
> "Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote
>
> | > Or, the whole system should have limited access, so
> | > that contractors have to call in to place an order.
> |
> | That's a stupid suggestion.  Design network, application, and
> | contractor access properly, this kind of crap will not happen.
> |
>
>   Then how do you suppose it's been happening,
> ubiquitously, for over 20 years? Are all "tech
> architects" incompetent? How is it that there's
> no online security when there's javascript?

You asked the magic question.

"How is it that there's no online security when there's 
javascript?"

Back to alt.apache.configuration | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack. "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2017-09-16 13:25 +0200
  Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack. Neil <neil@myplaceofwork.com> - 2017-09-16 09:39 -0400
    Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-09-16 09:49 -0400
      Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack. Neil <neil@myplaceofwork.com> - 2017-09-16 13:38 -0400
        Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-09-16 14:31 -0400
          Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack. Neil <neil@myplaceofwork.com> - 2017-09-16 15:47 -0400
            Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-09-17 07:05 -0400
            Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack. Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-09-17 16:21 -0400
    Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack. "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2017-09-17 08:51 -0400
      Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack. Neil <neil@myplaceofwork.com> - 2017-09-17 15:22 -0400
        Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack. "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2017-09-17 20:11 -0400
          Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack. Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2017-09-18 08:21 +0200
            Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack. "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2017-09-18 08:08 -0400
              Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack. Anonymous <anonymous@foto.nl1.torservers.net> - 2017-09-18 16:46 -0400
              Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack. Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201709.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2017-09-19 02:01 +0000
                Re: Linux / Unix / Java vulnerability responsible for the Equifax hack. "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2017-09-18 22:33 -0400

csiph-web