Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > alt.alien.research > #65221

Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get

From Nathan Smith <nathansmith@posteo.com>
Newsgroups sci.skeptic, alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, sci.physics, alt.alien.research
Subject Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get
Followup-To poster
Date 2025-11-11 19:44 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <877bvwx942.fsf@posteo.com> (permalink)
References <10et9sd$6d07$1@dont-email.me> <10etmgf$abqr$1@dont-email.me> <10etqsn$becs$3@dont-email.me> <10f007j$u5ja$1@dont-email.me> <10f0358$v40b$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Followups directed to: poster

Show all headers | View raw

JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> writes:

> On 11/11/25 1:45 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
>
>> Yes, as of today, they are excluded!
>
> No. Are you on the spectrum or something?  You have a VERY rigid
> way of thinking, excessively limited.

People on the spectrum being too rigid? You should see how rigid
neurotypicals are. They DEMAND their social norms rain supremacy and
will put anyone who doesn't wish to follow social norms through absolute
hell. Neurotypical women use to eat tape worms to stay thin to fit in
and can't say much has changed since then either. Neurotypicals are the
problem and should go fuck themselves.

Back to alt.alien.research | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-10 13:11 -0500
  Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-11-10 15:46 -0600
    Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-10 18:01 -0500
      Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-11-11 12:45 -0600
        Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-11 14:35 -0500
          Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-11-11 18:29 -0600
            Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-11-11 20:40 -0700
            Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Vincent Maycock <ma.ycock@gm.ail.com> - 2025-11-11 20:55 -0800
              Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Dawn Flood <Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> - 2025-11-11 23:35 -0600
            Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 00:44 -0500
              Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get "Henderson" <henderson@e.mail> - 2025-11-12 14:05 +0000
          Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Nathan Smith <nathansmith@posteo.com> - 2025-11-11 19:44 -0700
            Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 00:35 -0500
              Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get Nathan Smith <nathansmith@posteo.com> - 2025-11-12 01:42 -0700
                Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 11:27 -0500
              Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get "Henderson" <henderson@e.mail> - 2025-11-12 14:04 +0000
          Re: Another concept for Dawn Davenport to not get "Henderson" <henderson@e.mail> - 2025-11-12 16:42 +0000

csiph-web